mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-06-27 04:51:46 +00:00
Gap closure: feedback loops, traceability, and new /content-audit skill
- NEW /content-audit skill: GDD-specified content vs implemented content gap report with COMPLETE/IN PROGRESS/EARLY/NOT STARTED per system - balance-check: Fix & Verify Cycle phase (fix → re-verify → propagate-design-change) - perf-profile: Scope & Timeline Decision phase for M/L effort optimizations - playtest-report: Action Routing phase categorizes findings → design/balance/bugs/polish - review-all-gdds: Phase 4 Cross-System Scenario Walkthrough (multi-system sequences) - story-done: Test-Criterion Traceability (each AC mapped to a test, BLOCKING if >50% untested) - code-review: ADR Compliance Check (ARCHITECTURAL VIOLATION / ADR DRIFT / MINOR DEVIATION) - setup-engine: upgrade subcommand (pre-upgrade API scan, migration plan, VERSION.md update) - story-readiness: Asset References Check (verifies referenced asset paths exist) - validate-assets.sh: invalid JSON now exits 1 (blocking); naming issues exit 0 (warning) - workflow-catalog.yaml + sprint-plan: /scope-check wired into production phase Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -75,3 +75,35 @@ When invoked with `new`, generate this template:
|
||||
When invoked with `analyze`, read the raw notes, cross-reference with existing
|
||||
design documents, and fill in the template above with structured findings.
|
||||
Flag any playtest observations that conflict with design intent.
|
||||
|
||||
After generating or analyzing a report, run the **Action Routing** phase:
|
||||
|
||||
**Action Routing**
|
||||
|
||||
Categorize all findings from the report into the four buckets below (a single
|
||||
finding may appear in more than one bucket if appropriate):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Design changes needed** — fun issues, player confusion, broken mechanics,
|
||||
observations that conflict with the GDD's intended experience
|
||||
- **Balance adjustments** — numbers feel wrong, difficulty too spiked or too
|
||||
flat, economy or progression feedback
|
||||
- **Bug reports** — clear implementation defects that are reproducible
|
||||
- **Polish items** — not blocking progress, but friction or feel issues noted
|
||||
for later
|
||||
|
||||
Present the categorized list, then provide the routing guidance for each
|
||||
non-empty bucket:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Design changes:** "These findings suggest GDD revisions. Run
|
||||
`/propagate-design-change [path]` on the affected design document to find
|
||||
downstream impacts before making changes."
|
||||
- **Balance adjustments:** "Run `/balance-check [system]` to verify the full
|
||||
balance picture before tuning individual values."
|
||||
- **Bugs:** "Use `/bug-report` to formally track these so they are not lost
|
||||
between sessions."
|
||||
- **Polish items:** "No immediate action required. Consider adding these to the
|
||||
polish backlog in `production/` when the team reaches that phase."
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, ask:
|
||||
|
||||
> "Which category would you like to act on first?"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user