Release v1.0.0 — concept-prototype/vertical-slice split, workflow restructure, polish (#50)

* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration

- Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate)
- Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1)
  vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS
- Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows
- Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates
- Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map,
  and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline
- Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* sync v1 counts + polish

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts

- /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no
  existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes
  design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively
- /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description
  when no source doc exists, rather than failing
- /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when
  absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact
- /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured
  option capture at key authoring decision points
- workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec
  min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with
  updated descriptions
- .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills

Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option
prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all.

Skills patched:
- create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict
- sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options
- milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement
- retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B]
- quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect
- tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture
- regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect
- hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins

Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective,
quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields

- WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73),
  add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4),
  replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists,
  add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy,
  fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/
- coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note
- quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic"
- skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section
- All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps

Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files.

Pre-production flow:
- Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B
  (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion
- /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and
  create-architecture handoffs
- gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md
- dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics)
- start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding

AskUserQuestion gaps filled:
- balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check
  all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations
- hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation
- sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run)
- team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate
- design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect

All 9 team-* skills:
- Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected)
- team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/)
- team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent
- team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list
- team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories)
- team-release NO-GO override captures written justification
- team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED

Other fixes:
- Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs)
- AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md
- design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added;
  mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode
- story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware
- create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance
- consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run
- retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call
- smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback
- Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md
- gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification
  tool-action requirement all added

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills

All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution
internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo]
in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy

Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting),
contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day
coordinated disclosure timeline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines

Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements,
the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format,
and platform compatibility requirements.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md

Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate,
entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across
7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes
(#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.claude/docs/workflow-catalog.yaml

@@ -150,9 +150,17 @@ phases:
 
   pre-production:
     label: "Pre-Production"
-    description: "UX specs, asset specs, prototype the core mechanic, define stories, validate fun"
+    description: "Visual entity inventory, UX specs, asset specs, prototype the core mechanic, define stories, validate fun"
     next_phase: production
     steps:
+      - id: entity-inventory
+        name: "Visual Entity & Screen Inventory"
+        command: /asset-spec
+        required: false
+        artifact:
+          glob: "design/assets/entity-inventory.md"
+        description: "Enumerate everything the game needs visually: entities (characters, enemies, buildings, environment pieces), UI screens, HUD elements, panels. Run /asset-spec with no arguments to start a collaborative inventory session — brief or detailed based on your responses. Reads GDDs and art bible to propose a starting list; you add, remove, and adjust. Becomes the source of truth for all art and UX work. Not required if the game has very few distinct visual elements."
+
       - id: asset-spec
         name: "Asset Specs"
         command: /asset-spec
@@ -160,7 +168,7 @@ phases:
         repeatable: true
         artifact:
           glob: "design/assets/asset-manifest.md"
-        description: "Generate per-asset visual specifications and AI generation prompts from approved GDDs and level docs. Run once per system/level/character."
+        description: "Generate per-asset visual specifications and AI generation prompts. Run once per entity, system, level, or character. If no source doc exists, /asset-spec interviews you inline — no narrative document required."
 
       - id: ux-design
         name: "UX Specs (key screens)"
@@ -169,8 +177,8 @@ phases:
         repeatable: true
         artifact:
           glob: "design/ux/*.md"
-          min_count: 1
-        description: "Author UX specs for main menu, core gameplay HUD, and interaction patterns. Reads input method and platform from technical-preferences.md."
+          min_count: 3
+        description: "Author UX specs for the screens identified in the entity inventory (or GDDs if no inventory). Minimum required: main menu, core gameplay HUD, pause menu. Add more screens as the inventory identifies them. Reads input method and platform from technical-preferences.md."
 
       - id: ux-review
         name: "UX Review"
@@ -181,11 +189,11 @@ phases:
       - id: prototype
         name: "Prototype"
         command: /prototype
-        required: true
+        required: false
         artifact:
           glob: "prototypes/*/README.md"
           min_count: 1
-        description: "Build throwaway prototypes in isolated worktree to validate core mechanic"
+        description: "Build a throwaway prototype to validate the core mechanic is fun before committing to full production. Recommended for first-time mechanics or high-risk design decisions. Solo devs with proven concepts may skip."
 
       - id: create-epics
         name: "Create Epics"
@@ -225,13 +233,13 @@ phases:
         description: "Plan the first sprint with prioritized stories from epics"
 
       - id: vertical-slice
-        name: "Vertical Slice (playtested)"
-        command: /playtest-report
-        required: true
+        name: "Vertical Slice"
+        command: /vertical-slice
+        required: false
         artifact:
-          glob: "production/playtests/*.md"
+          glob: "prototypes/*/REPORT.md"
           min_count: 1
-        description: "Document vertical slice playtest sessions using /playtest-report. Run at least once here (≥1 session required before Production; ≥3 required before Polish). Each session should cover one complete run-through of the core loop."
+        description: "Build and playtest a vertical slice — a complete end-to-end pass through the core loop. Recommended before committing epics and stories to production. Skipping is a valid solo dev call but increases risk of late-stage design pivots. If built, must be played and documented before advancing."
 
   production:
     label: "Production"