ksh999000/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git synced 2026-06-27 04:51:46 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Release v1.0.0 — concept-prototype/vertical-slice split, workflow restructure, polish (#50)

Browse Source 
* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration

- Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate)
- Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1)
  vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS
- Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows
- Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates
- Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map,
  and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline
- Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* sync v1 counts + polish

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts

- /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no
  existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes
  design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively
- /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description
  when no source doc exists, rather than failing
- /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when
  absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact
- /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured
  option capture at key authoring decision points
- workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec
  min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with
  updated descriptions
- .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills

Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option
prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all.

Skills patched:
- create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict
- sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options
- milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement
- retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B]
- quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect
- tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture
- regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect
- hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins

Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective,
quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields

- WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73),
  add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4),
  replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists,
  add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy,
  fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/
- coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note
- quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic"
- skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section
- All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps

Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files.

Pre-production flow:
- Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B
  (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion
- /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and
  create-architecture handoffs
- gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md
- dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics)
- start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding

AskUserQuestion gaps filled:
- balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check
  all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations
- hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation
- sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run)
- team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate
- design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect

All 9 team-* skills:
- Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected)
- team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/)
- team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent
- team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list
- team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories)
- team-release NO-GO override captures written justification
- team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED

Other fixes:
- Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs)
- AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md
- design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added;
  mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode
- story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware
- create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance
- consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run
- retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call
- smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback
- Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md
- gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification
  tool-action requirement all added

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills

All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution
internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo]
in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy

Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting),
contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day
coordinated disclosure timeline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines

Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements,
the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format,
and platform compatibility requirements.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md

Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate,
entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across
7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes
(#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Donchitos
2026-05-13 20:15:08 +10:00
committed by GitHub
parent 7ad8ab31c9
commit 984023ddac
97 changed files with 2883 additions and 710 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

55
.claude/skills/story-done/SKILL.md
View File

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ description: "End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies eac
argument-hint: "[story-file-path] [--review full|lean|solo]"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Write, Edit, AskUserQuestion, Task
model: sonnet
---
# Story Done
@@ -168,9 +169,10 @@ playtest record referencing this story.
If none found: flag as **BLOCKING** (same rule as Logic).
**For Visual/Feel and UI stories**: glob `production/qa/evidence/` for a file
referencing this story. If none: flag as **ADVISORY** —
"No manual test evidence found. Create `production/qa/evidence/[story-slug]-evidence.md`
using the test-evidence template and obtain sign-off before final closure."
referencing this story.
- If none: flag as **ADVISORY** — "No manual test evidence found. Create `production/qa/evidence/[story-slug]-evidence.md` using the test-evidence template and obtain sign-off before final closure."
- If found: read the file and check the sign-off table for unchecked boxes. Grep for lines matching `| .* | .* | .* | \[ \] Approved` (a sign-off row with an unchecked checkbox). If any unchecked sign-off rows are found: flag as **ADVISORY** — "Evidence file found at `[path]` but [N] sign-off(s) are still pending (shown as `[ ] Approved` in the sign-off table). Obtain required sign-offs before final closure. Note: for solo developers, all roles may be signed off by the same person."
- If all sign-off rows show `[x] Approved` or equivalent: note "Evidence file found and all sign-offs complete — ADVISORY passed."
**For Config/Data stories**: check for any `production/qa/smoke-*.md` file.
If none: flag as **ADVISORY** — "No smoke check report found. Run `/smoke-check`."
@@ -255,7 +257,13 @@ Skip this phase for Config/Data stories (no code tests required).
**Review mode check** — apply before spawning LP-CODE-REVIEW:
- `solo` → skip. Note: "LP-CODE-REVIEW skipped — Solo mode." Proceed to Phase 6 (completion report).
- `lean` → skip (not a PHASE-GATE). Note: "LP-CODE-REVIEW skipped — Lean mode." Proceed to Phase 6 (completion report).
- `lean` → use `AskUserQuestion` before proceeding:
- Prompt: "Code review is skipped in lean mode. Did you run `/code-review` on the implemented files?"
- Options:
- `Yes — /code-review passed or was approved with suggestions`
- `No — skipping code review for this story`
- `No — I'll run /code-review before the sprint close-out`
- Record the answer in the completion notes (Phase 7). All three options proceed to Phase 6.
- `full` → spawn as normal.
Spawn `lead-programmer` via Task using gate **LP-CODE-REVIEW** (`.claude/docs/director-gates.md`).
@@ -321,13 +329,21 @@ fixed. Offer to help fix the blocking items.
## Phase 7: Update Story Status
Ask before writing: "May I update the story file to mark it Complete and log
the completion notes?"
Use `AskUserQuestion` before writing anything:
- Prompt: "Verification complete. How do you want to proceed?"
- Options:
- `Close the story — update file, mark Complete, log notes (Recommended)`
- `Close and log advisory deviations as tech debt in docs/tech-debt-register.md`
- `There are issues I want to fix first — don't close yet`
- `Accept deviations as-is and close anyway`
If yes, edit the story file:
If "Close", "Close and log tech debt", or "Accept deviations": edit the story file.
If "Close and log tech debt": after updating the story file, also append the advisory deviations to `docs/tech-debt-register.md` (create the file if it does not exist).
If "Fix first": stop here and list what the user flagged. Do not write any files.
1. Update the status field: `Status: Complete`
2. Add a `## Completion Notes` section at the bottom:
2. Update the `Last Updated:` field in the story header to today's date (format: `YYYY-MM-DD`). If the field does not exist, add it after the `Status:` line.
3. Add a `## Completion Notes` section at the bottom:
```markdown
## Completion Notes
@@ -338,15 +354,28 @@ If yes, edit the story file:
**Code Review**: [Pending / Complete / Skipped]
```
3. If advisory deviations exist, ask: "Should I log these as tech debt in
`docs/tech-debt-register.md`?"
4. If the user chose "Close and log tech debt": append each advisory deviation to `docs/tech-debt-register.md` in this format:
```
- **[date]** ([story title]): [deviation description] — tracked from [story file path]
```
Create the file with a `# Tech Debt Register` heading if it does not exist.
4. **Update `production/sprint-status.yaml`** (if it exists):
5. **Update `production/sprint-status.yaml`** (if it exists):
- Find the entry matching this story's file path or ID
- Set `status: done` and `completed: [today's date]`
- Update the top-level `updated` field
- This is a silent update — no extra approval needed (already approved in step above)
6. **Suggest a git commit**: Output a ready-to-use commit command covering the implementation files from the dev-story summary and the updated story file:
```
Suggested commit:
git add [src/ and tests/ files changed during implementation] [story-file-path]
git commit -m "feat: [story title] ([TR-ID])"
```
The `validate-commit.sh` hook will verify design doc references and check for hardcoded values automatically.
### Session State Update
After updating the story file, silently append to
@@ -395,7 +424,9 @@ Run these in order:
1. `/smoke-check sprint` — verify the critical path still works end-to-end
2. `/team-qa sprint` — full QA cycle: test case execution, bug triage, sign-off report
3. `/gate-check` — advance to the next phase once QA approves
3. `/retrospective` — capture what went well, what didn't, and action items for the next sprint
4. `/gate-check` — advance to the next phase once QA approves (only if advancing a phase)
5. `/sprint-plan new` — plan the next sprint, incorporating velocity data and retrospective action items
Do not run `/gate-check` until `/team-qa` returns APPROVED or APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS.
```