ksh999000/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git synced 2026-06-27 04:51:46 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add director gates system: shared review checkpoints across all workflow skills

Browse Source 
Creates .claude/docs/director-gates.md as a central registry of 18 named gate
prompts (CD-*, TD-*, PR-*, LP-*, QL-*, ND-*, AD-*) covering all 7 production
stages. Skills now reference gate IDs instead of embedding inline director prompts,
eliminating drift when prompts need updating.

Updated 15 skills to use gate IDs: brainstorm, map-systems, design-system,
architecture-decision, create-architecture, create-epics, create-stories,
sprint-plan, milestone-review, playtest-report, prototype, story-done,
gate-check, setup-engine, start.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Donchitos
2026-03-29 17:24:06 +11:00
parent 167fb6c5f2
commit b139bcf087
16 changed files with 997 additions and 106 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
.claude/skills/gate-check/SKILL.md
View File

@@ -257,6 +257,40 @@ For items that can't be automatically verified, **ask the user**:
---
## 4b. Director Panel Assessment
Before generating the final verdict, spawn all three directors as **parallel subagents** via Task using the parallel gate protocol from `.claude/docs/director-gates.md`. Issue all three Task calls simultaneously — do not wait for one before starting the next.
**Spawn in parallel:**
1. **`creative-director`** — gate **CD-PHASE-GATE** (`.claude/docs/director-gates.md`)
2. **`technical-director`** — gate **TD-PHASE-GATE** (`.claude/docs/director-gates.md`)
3. **`producer`** — gate **PR-PHASE-GATE** (`.claude/docs/director-gates.md`)
Pass to each: target phase name, list of artifacts present, and the context fields listed in that gate's definition.
**Collect all three responses, then present the Director Panel summary:**
```
## Director Panel Assessment
Creative Director: [READY / CONCERNS / NOT READY]
[feedback]
Technical Director: [READY / CONCERNS / NOT READY]
[feedback]
Producer: [READY / CONCERNS / NOT READY]
[feedback]
```
**Apply to the verdict:**
- Any director returns NOT READY → verdict is minimum FAIL (user may override with explicit acknowledgement)
- Any director returns CONCERNS → verdict is minimum CONCERNS
- All three READY → eligible for PASS (still subject to artifact and quality checks from Section 3)
---
## 5. Output the Verdict
```