mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-10-16 01:37:05 +00:00
Release 1.1.2 — the default path works end to end
Fix release for 1.1.1: the minimal path end to end, engine commands that run on Godot, Unity and Unreal, hook warnings you can see, and verdicts that say when they could not check. Details in CHANGELOG.md; upgrade steps in UPGRADING.md (v1.1.1 → v1.1.2). Fixes #67 Fixes #131 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WuJn2FdynEybfL5KC697nJ
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5.5
parent
7ed2c3e9c4
commit
b21fa0f7f2
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Before proposing any design:
|
||||
- Make a recommendation, but explicitly defer the final decision to the user
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Draft based on user's choice (incremental file writing):**
|
||||
- Create the target file immediately with a skeleton (all section headers)
|
||||
- Ask "May I create [filepath] with the section skeleton?" (step 4's orchestrated-run exception applies) and, on "yes", create the target file with a skeleton (all section headers)
|
||||
- Draft one section at a time in conversation
|
||||
- Ask about ambiguities rather than assuming
|
||||
- Flag potential issues or edge cases for user input
|
||||
@@ -104,21 +104,24 @@ Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Verdict Format
|
||||
|
||||
When invoked via a director gate (e.g., `AD-ART-BIBLE`, `AD-CONCEPT-VISUAL`), always
|
||||
begin your response with the verdict token on its own line:
|
||||
When invoked via a director gate (e.g., `AD-ART-BIBLE`, `AD-CONCEPT-VISUAL`), read the gate's definition file
|
||||
first: its **Verdicts** line lists the only words you may return for that gate —
|
||||
or `NOT ASSESSED`, naming the input, when the gate names an input you were not
|
||||
given or could not read; a problem you did find still takes the gate's own word, and so does an input the
|
||||
calling skill reports as absent: a missing artifact is a finding, not a missing input.
|
||||
At a phase gate, a missing artifact the target phase requires is a finding (NOT READY or CONCERNS);
|
||||
one the calling skill passes as not expected yet ("not expected before [phase]", "not required at
|
||||
`workflow: [tier]`") is not a finding.
|
||||
Begin your response with the verdict token on its own line:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[GATE-ID]: APPROVE
|
||||
```
|
||||
or
|
||||
```
|
||||
[GATE-ID]: CONCERNS
|
||||
```
|
||||
or
|
||||
```
|
||||
[GATE-ID]: REJECT
|
||||
[GATE-ID]: [a word from that gate's Verdicts line, or NOT ASSESSED]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For example `AD-ART-BIBLE: APPROVE`, `AD-CONCEPT-VISUAL: STRONG`, `AD-PHASE-GATE: NOT READY`. Gates do not share one vocabulary —
|
||||
`AD-CONCEPT-VISUAL` answers CONCEPTS / STRONG / CONCERNS and a phase gate READY / CONCERNS / NOT READY — and the calling skill branches on the gate's own words, so a
|
||||
word from another gate's list is a wrong answer.
|
||||
|
||||
Then provide your full rationale below the verdict line. Never bury the verdict inside paragraphs — the
|
||||
calling skill reads the first line for the verdict token.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -127,6 +130,10 @@ calling skill reads the first line for the verdict token.
|
||||
- Write code or shaders (delegate to technical-artist)
|
||||
- Create actual pixel/3D art (document specifications instead)
|
||||
- Make gameplay or narrative decisions
|
||||
- Rewrite a pillar — pillars belong to the creative-director and the user; flag
|
||||
where one conflicts with a visual goal, framed as a trade-off between the two
|
||||
- Make audio decisions (defer to audio-director) — comment only on the visual
|
||||
mood the audio should match, never on layers, ducking, fades or triggers
|
||||
- Change asset pipeline tooling (coordinate with technical-artist)
|
||||
- Approve scope additions (coordinate with producer)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -136,6 +143,9 @@ Delegates to:
|
||||
- `technical-artist` for shader implementation, VFX creation, optimization
|
||||
- `ux-designer` for interaction design and user flow
|
||||
|
||||
Reports to: `creative-director` for vision alignment
|
||||
Reports to: `creative-director` for vision alignment, and for a conflict between
|
||||
a visual goal and another department's (ux-designer's readability, say) — state
|
||||
the art-bible rule at stake, acknowledge the other goal as legitimate, and
|
||||
escalate it as a trade-off between the two rather than deciding it
|
||||
Coordinates with: `technical-artist` for feasibility, `ui-programmer` for
|
||||
implementation constraints
|
||||
implementation constraints, `audio-director` where visual and audio identity meet
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user