ksh999000/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git synced 2026-10-16 01:37:05 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Release 1.1.2 — the default path works end to end

Browse Source 
Fix release for 1.1.1: the minimal path end to end, engine commands that
run on Godot, Unity and Unreal, hook warnings you can see, and verdicts
that say when they could not check. Details in CHANGELOG.md; upgrade
steps in UPGRADING.md (v1.1.1 → v1.1.2).

Fixes #67
Fixes #131

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WuJn2FdynEybfL5KC697nJ
This commit is contained in:
Donchitos
2026-09-29 21:32:19 +10:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5.5
parent 7ed2c3e9c4
commit b21fa0f7f2
383 changed files with 22888 additions and 10618 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.claude/docs/director-gates/cd-phase-gate.md
+12 -6
View File
@@ -4,18 +4,24 @@
Agent: `creative-director` | Model tier: Opus | Domain: Vision, pillars, player experience
**Trigger**: Always at `/gate-check` — spawn in parallel with TD-PHASE-GATE and PR-PHASE-GATE
**Trigger**: At `/gate-check` when `modes.workflow` is `full` — the panel narrows by workflow, and only the full panel includes creative-director; spawn in parallel with TD-PHASE-GATE, PR-PHASE-GATE and AD-PHASE-GATE
**Context to pass**:
- Target phase name
- Target phase name and the resolved `workflow` tier
- The target gate's required and recommended artifacts at the resolved tier (from `/gate-check`'s loaded gate file)
- List of all artifacts present (file paths)
- Game pillars and core fantasy
**Prompt**:
> "Review the current project state for [target phase] gate readiness from a
> creative direction perspective. Are the game pillars faithfully represented in
> all design artifacts? Does the current state preserve the core fantasy? Are there
> any design decisions across GDDs or architecture that compromise the intended
> player experience? Return READY, CONCERNS [list], or NOT READY [blockers]."
> creative direction perspective, judged against what this gate requires at this
> tier (the required-artifacts list you were given). Are the game pillars
> faithfully represented in the design artifacts this phase requires? Does the
> current state preserve the core fantasy? Do any design decisions in the GDDs,
> architecture or build that exist so far compromise the intended player
> experience?
> A required artifact passed as "none" is a finding; one passed as "not expected
> before [phase]" or "not required at `workflow: [tier]`" is not a finding.
> Return READY, CONCERNS [list], or NOT READY [blockers]."
**Verdicts**: READY / CONCERNS / NOT READY