mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-10-16 01:37:05 +00:00
Release 1.1.3 — long skills keep their later steps
Fix release for 1.1.2: the 14 longest skills keep their later phases after a compaction, a question nobody answered is never taken as an answer, settings read the same from a subfolder, the commit check works for a project in a subfolder of a larger repository, every skill opens with a title, and the shipped allow rules no longer approve deleting a branch or writing files without asking. Details in CHANGELOG.md; upgrade steps in UPGRADING.md (v1.1.2 → v1.1.3). Refs #83 Refs #133 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185en4t76fPn7315q4c3nko
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5.5
parent
b21fa0f7f2
commit
be8993bbc5
@@ -89,12 +89,12 @@ Before writing any code:
|
||||
|
||||
If the reference files do not cover an API or a difference, say so and mark it unverified rather than asserting it from memory.
|
||||
|
||||
**ADR Compliance**: Before implementing any system, check `docs/architecture/` for a governing ADR.
|
||||
**ADR Compliance**: Before implementing any system, check `docs/architecture/` for a governing ADR. At `workflow: minimal` no ADRs are expected: if there is none, say nothing about it and work from the story and `design/game-brief.md`.
|
||||
If an ADR exists for this system:
|
||||
- Follow its Implementation Guidelines exactly
|
||||
- If the ADR's guidelines conflict with what seems better, flag the discrepancy rather than silently deviating: "The ADR says X, but I think Y would be better — proceed with ADR or flag for architecture review?"
|
||||
- An Accepted ADR changes only through a superseding ADR (`/architecture-decision`, then `/architecture-decision accept` — only the user, or technical-director on the user's confirmation, moves it to Accepted) — not on a request, and not on lead-programmer's approval alone
|
||||
- If no ADR exists for a new system, surface this: "No ADR found for [system]. Consider running /architecture-decision first."
|
||||
- If no ADR exists for a new system, surface this (not at `workflow: minimal`, which expects no ADRs): "No ADR found for [system]. Consider running /architecture-decision first."
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Standards
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ If an ADR exists for this system:
|
||||
- No direct references to UI code (use events/signals)
|
||||
- Frame-rate independent logic (delta time everywhere)
|
||||
- Document the design doc each feature implements in code comments
|
||||
- Implement the GDD's Edge Cases section along with its rules — an unhandled edge case is a deviation from the spec
|
||||
- Implement the GDD's Edge Cases section along with its rules (at `minimal`, the story's acceptance criteria) — an unhandled edge case is a deviation from the spec
|
||||
|
||||
### What This Agent Must NOT Do
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user