Release 1.1.3 — long skills keep their later steps

Fix release for 1.1.2: the 14 longest skills keep their later phases
after a compaction, a question nobody answered is never taken as an
answer, settings read the same from a subfolder, the commit check works
for a project in a subfolder of a larger repository, every skill opens
with a title, and the shipped allow rules no longer approve deleting a
branch or writing files without asking. Details in CHANGELOG.md; upgrade
steps in UPGRADING.md (v1.1.2 → v1.1.3).

Refs #83
Refs #133

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185en4t76fPn7315q4c3nko
This commit is contained in:
Donchitos
2026-10-08 17:52:48 +11:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5.5
parent b21fa0f7f2
commit be8993bbc5
231 changed files with 12000 additions and 10527 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# /story-done — Phase 2: Read the Story
> Part of `/story-done`. `SKILL.md` names when to read this file; the settings it
> resolved and the rules under its later headings still apply here.
## Phase 2: Read the Story
Read the full story file. Extract and hold in context:
- **Story name and ID**
- **GDD Requirement TR-ID(s)** referenced (e.g., `TR-combat-001`)
- **Manifest Version** embedded in the story header (e.g., `2026-03-10`)
- **ADR reference(s)** referenced
- **Acceptance Criteria** — the complete list (every checkbox item)
- **Implementation files** — files listed under "files to create/modify"
- **Story Type** — the `Type:` field from the story header (Logic / Integration / Visual/Feel / UI / Config/Data)
- **Engine notes** — any engine-specific constraints noted
- **Definition of Done** — if present, the story-level DoD
- **Estimated vs actual scope** — if an estimate was noted
Also read:
- `docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml` — grep the story's TR-IDs
(`Grep pattern="id: <each TR-ID>\s*$" path="docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml" output_mode="content" -A 6`),
not a full read of the registry. Read the *current* `requirement` text from each
matched entry. This is the source of truth for what the GDD required — do not use any
requirement text that may be quoted inline in the story (it may be stale).
- The referenced GDD section — just the acceptance criteria and key rules, not
the full document. Use this to cross-check the registry text is still accurate.
- The referenced ADR(s) — **just the `## Decision` and `## Consequences`
sections, never an unbounded full read.** Map headings first
(`Grep pattern="^## " path="docs/architecture/[adr-file].md" output_mode="content" -n`),
then bounded-`Read` only those two spans. This is the exact same content
Phase 4 item 3's ADR constraints check needs — hold it here, do not
re-read it there.
- `docs/architecture/control-manifest.md` header — extract the current
`Manifest Version:` date (used in Phase 4 staleness check)
---