mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-10-16 01:37:05 +00:00
Release 1.1.0 — one config file, and a process weight you choose
`project.yaml` at the repo root is now the single source of truth for a project's configuration, replacing `production/stage.txt`, `production/review-mode.txt` and `.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md` (all three still read as a fallback; nothing is force-deleted). **`modes.rigor` — one question instead of six.** `minimal`, `standard` or `full` fronts six knobs: `modes.workflow`, `docs.density`, `qa.level`, `modes.story_granularity`, `modes.review_mode` and `team.size`. It defaults to `minimal`, which is a change from 1.0's behaviour: the heavier tier was measured costing several times more to reach working code without producing a better result, and returning nothing when a fresh developer inherited the project. Pin `modes.rigor: standard` to keep 1.0's process level. Also in this release: - `/settings` to view or change any setting, and `project.local.yaml` for per-developer preferences that should not be committed. - `system_overrides` to hold one system to a higher standard than the rest of the project, and `testing.strict` to set per test type whether missing evidence blocks a story or warns. - A story that changes anything the player sees is not closed until the game has been launched, observed, and a screenshot retained in `production/qa/evidence/`. A parse check is not a run. This holds at every rigor level, including `minimal`, where automated tests are waived but the look is not. - The code root is engine-specific and enforced as such: Godot `src/`, Unity `Assets/`, Unreal `Source/<Module>/`. Two of the three will not build a project laid out any other way. - Migration tooling for existing projects: `.claude/scripts/migrate-v1-config.sh` converts a 1.0 layout, non-destructively by default, with a report to review before `--finalize` deletes anything. - Ask-before-write holds regardless of personal automation settings. Upgrading from 1.0 or earlier: see UPGRADING.md. Full list of changes: CHANGELOG.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016xvzG3i7pWQg4LjyDwWMXd
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
984023ddac
commit
d05699707f
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
paths:
|
||||
- ".claude/agent-memory/**"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Agent Memory Rules
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent memory is the one place an agent may write without asking — and the only
|
||||
one.** `.claude/agent-memory/` is gitignored, per-agent, and never ships. That
|
||||
exemption exists because the memory is the agent's own working notes about how to
|
||||
do its job, not a project artifact.
|
||||
|
||||
It does **not** extend anywhere else. The Collaboration Protocol still governs
|
||||
every file under `src/`, `design/`, `docs/`, `production/` and `assets/`: ask
|
||||
first, naming the path. Writing a memory is never a substitute for asking, and a
|
||||
memory must never be used to record something the user declined to have written.
|
||||
|
||||
## Never record a temporary absence as a durable fact
|
||||
|
||||
This is the failure this file exists to prevent, and this repo is unusually
|
||||
exposed to it.
|
||||
|
||||
**CCGS ships as a template the user clones *as their game*.** So on day one every
|
||||
agent observes the same things — no `src/`, no GDDs, no engine configured, no
|
||||
`tests/performance/` — and every one of those observations is **guaranteed to
|
||||
stop being true**. A memory reading *"this repo is the framework, not a game;
|
||||
perf requests have no target"* is accurate when written and actively harmful two
|
||||
weeks later, when it tells a future run to return BLOCKED on a project that now
|
||||
has a build. The agent will not re-derive it; that is what memory is for.
|
||||
|
||||
So:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Prefer recording a method over a state.** "Confirm an engine project and a
|
||||
captured profile exist before profiling; return BLOCKED naming what is missing
|
||||
rather than estimating" is durable. "There is no game here" is a timestamp.
|
||||
- **If you must record a state, state what invalidates it**, on the same line:
|
||||
`INVALIDATED WHEN: project.yaml declares an engine, or src/ contains game code.`
|
||||
A reader with no other context must be able to tell whether the note still
|
||||
holds.
|
||||
- **Never record absence of a game, of assets, of tests or of config as a
|
||||
settled property of the project.** Those are the states CCGS exists to move a
|
||||
user out of.
|
||||
|
||||
## Disclose the write
|
||||
|
||||
Say in your response that you recorded a memory and where. An unmentioned write
|
||||
is indistinguishable from no write, and the user cannot correct a note they do
|
||||
not know exists — the same reason a skipped check has to announce itself
|
||||
(`.claude/rules/skill-authoring.md`, obligation 3).
|
||||
|
||||
## Verify before you trust
|
||||
|
||||
A recalled memory reflects what was true when it was written. If it names a file,
|
||||
a path, a setting or a count, **check that it still holds before acting on it**.
|
||||
Memory is a starting point for investigation, never evidence.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user