Donchitos
|
0bbf25ec31
|
Pipeline integrity + brownfield adoption system
Pipeline integrity (4 fixes for snapshot-vs-live-reference problem):
- NEW docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml: persistent stable TR-IDs per GDD
requirement; /architecture-review bootstraps and appends, never renumbers
- /create-control-manifest: added Manifest Version stamp to header
- /create-epics-stories: stories embed TR-ID reference (not quoted text),
Manifest Version from manifest, ADR status gate (Proposed → Blocked)
- /story-done: TR-ID registry lookup at review time, manifest staleness check
- /story-readiness: ADR Accepted check, TR-ID validity, manifest version check
- /review-all-gdds + /architecture-review: fixed parenthetical status values
("Needs Revision" only, no parentheticals that break exact-match reads)
Workflow infrastructure:
- NEW /help skill: context-aware "what's next" using workflow-catalog.yaml
- NEW .claude/docs/workflow-catalog.yaml: YAML-driven phase/step sequence
- /sprint-plan + /sprint-status: sprint-status.yaml machine-written tracking
Brownfield adoption system (migrate, not replace):
- NEW /adopt skill: format compliance audit (not existence check); classifies
gaps BLOCKING/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW; produces docs/adoption-plan-[date].md with
numbered migration plan; never regenerates existing artifacts
- /design-system retrofit [path]: fills only missing GDD sections, preserves
all existing content
- /architecture-decision retrofit [path]: adds missing ADR sections (Status,
ADR Dependencies, Engine Compatibility) without touching existing content
- /start option D: split into D1 (early-stage) and D2 (has GDDs/ADRs → adopt)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2026-03-11 18:46:07 +11:00 |
|