mirror of https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git synced 2026-10-16 01:37:05 +00:00

Files

T

DonchitosandClaude Opus 5 d05699707f Release 1.1.0 — one config file, and a process weight you choose

`project.yaml` at the repo root is now the single source of truth for a
project's configuration, replacing `production/stage.txt`,
`production/review-mode.txt` and `.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md` (all
three still read as a fallback; nothing is force-deleted).

**`modes.rigor` — one question instead of six.** `minimal`, `standard` or
`full` fronts six knobs: `modes.workflow`, `docs.density`, `qa.level`,
`modes.story_granularity`, `modes.review_mode` and `team.size`. It defaults to
`minimal`, which is a change from 1.0's behaviour: the heavier tier was
measured costing several times more to reach working code without producing a
better result, and returning nothing when a fresh developer inherited the
project. Pin `modes.rigor: standard` to keep 1.0's process level.

Also in this release:

- `/settings` to view or change any setting, and `project.local.yaml` for
  per-developer preferences that should not be committed.
- `system_overrides` to hold one system to a higher standard than the rest of
  the project, and `testing.strict` to set per test type whether missing
  evidence blocks a story or warns.
- A story that changes anything the player sees is not closed until the game
  has been launched, observed, and a screenshot retained in
  `production/qa/evidence/`. A parse check is not a run. This holds at every
  rigor level, including `minimal`, where automated tests are waived but the
  look is not.
- The code root is engine-specific and enforced as such: Godot `src/`, Unity
  `Assets/`, Unreal `Source/<Module>/`. Two of the three will not build a
  project laid out any other way.
- Migration tooling for existing projects: `.claude/scripts/migrate-v1-config.sh`
  converts a 1.0 layout, non-destructively by default, with a report to review
  before `--finalize` deletes anything.
- Ask-before-write holds regardless of personal automation settings.

Upgrading from 1.0 or earlier: see UPGRADING.md. Full list of changes:
CHANGELOG.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016xvzG3i7pWQg4LjyDwWMXd

2026-09-23 12:25:11 +10:00

5.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

/story-readiness — Handoff Contract

Role in Pipeline

Validates that a story file contains everything a developer needs to begin implementation and produces a READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED / NOT ASSESSED verdict — sits between /create-stories and /dev-story, acting as a blocking gate before any code is written.

Inputs Required

Files That Must Exist

File	Required Fields / Sections	Read-Only?
`production/epics/[epic-slug]/story-NNN-[slug].md`	All header fields (`Status:`, `Layer:`, `Type:`, `Manifest Version:`), `## Context` (GDD path, TR-ID, ADR reference, Engine Notes, Control Manifest Rules), `## Acceptance Criteria`, `## Test Evidence`, `## Dependencies`, `## Out of Scope`	Yes
`docs/architecture/control-manifest.md`	`Manifest Version:` date in header, layer rules	Yes (if exists)
`docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml`	`id`, `status` fields per TR entry	Yes (if exists)
`docs/architecture/adr-NNNN-[slug].md` (all ADRs referenced in stories)	`Status:` field	Yes
`design/gdd/systems-index.md`	Which systems have approved GDDs	Yes

Preconditions

The story file being validated was produced by /create-stories (or follows the same format)
For sprint scope: a sprint file exists in production/sprints/ with story path references
For all scope: production/epics/ directory exists and contains story files

Outputs Produced

Files Written

None. This skill is strictly read-only and produces no file modifications under any circumstance.

Output Guarantees

A verdict of READY, NEEDS WORK, BLOCKED or NOT ASSESSED is produced for every story file evaluated. NOT ASSESSED is not a synonym for BLOCKED: BLOCKED names a real, listable obstacle, while NOT ASSESSED means the story could not be evaluated at all. An empty scope yields NOT ASSESSED — no stories in scope, never a Ready: 0 / Needs Work: 0 / Blocked: 0 summary over an empty list
Every non-READY verdict includes a specific gap list with fix instructions for each failing checklist item
Every BLOCKED verdict names the specific blocker (missing dependency story path, Proposed ADR ID, or unresolved design question marker)
For sprint scope: a sprint-level escalation warning is prepended if any Must Have story is not READY
The skill offers to draft missing sections in conversation but never uses Write or Edit tools

Immutability Rules

READS but does NOT modify: story files, docs/architecture/control-manifest.md, docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml, all ADR files, design/gdd/systems-index.md, sprint files, any referenced asset files (existence-only Glob checks)
MODIFIES: nothing

Hard Constraints (Never Violate)

Never use Write or Edit tools under any circumstances
Never draft corrections directly into files — offer drafts in conversation only
Never mark a story READY if its governing ADR has Status: Proposed
Never mark a story READY if a dependency story file is missing or has Status: Draft
Never re-read the same ADR file multiple times in one run — cache ADR statuses after the first read
Never penalize a story for missing Manifest Version: if control-manifest.md does not exist
Never penalize a story for missing TR-ID if tr-registry.yaml does not exist

Downstream Skill Expects

Next skill: /dev-story

It will rely on this skill's verdict as follows:

If verdict is READY: /dev-story proceeds with implementation using the story file as its source of truth
If verdict is NEEDS WORK or BLOCKED: /dev-story must not be run until the story is corrected and re-validated
/dev-story reads the same story fields this skill validates — a READY verdict is an implicit guarantee that those fields are present, parseable, and internally consistent:
- Type: field is set to a valid story type
- ## Acceptance Criteria contains specific, testable checkbox items
- ## Test Evidence specifies a concrete evidence path
- The governing ADR exists and has Status: Accepted
- Manifest Version: matches the current control manifest
- TR-ID in ## Context is present and resolves in docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml (when the registry exists)
- ## Dependencies section is present (may say "None")
- ## Out of Scope section is present (checked for existence; /dev-story uses it to enforce implementation boundaries)

Known Fragile Points

If control-manifest.md is regenerated with a new Manifest Version: date, every story that embeds the old date will fail the manifest version check — a bulk update of all story Manifest Version: fields is required before stories can pass readiness again
If an ADR is silently renamed or moved after stories reference it by ID, the ADR file-existence check will BLOCK those stories even though the decision content is unchanged
The manifest version comparison is a string date match, not a semantic version comparison — if the date format changes (e.g., from 2026-01-15 to Jan 15 2026), all stories will fail the check regardless of actual currency
Asset existence checks use Glob — on Windows, path separator mismatches (\ vs /) may cause a Glob miss that incorrectly flags an asset as missing
The TR-ID status check auto-passes if the registry does not exist, which means stories written before TR tracking was introduced will always pass this check even if they contain invalid or placeholder IDs like TR-[system]-???
For sprint scope, the skill depends on sprint file formatting to extract story paths — if the sprint file format changes, story paths may not be parsed and the scope silently reduces to zero stories validated

5.6 KiB Raw Blame History