* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration - Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate) - Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1) vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS - Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows - Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates - Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map, and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline - Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * sync v1 counts + polish Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts - /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively - /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description when no source doc exists, rather than failing - /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact - /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured option capture at key authoring decision points - workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with updated descriptions - .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all. Skills patched: - create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict - sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options - milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement - retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B] - quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect - tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture - regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect - hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective, quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields - WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73), add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4), replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists, add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy, fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/ - coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note - quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic" - skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section - All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files. Pre-production flow: - Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion - /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and create-architecture handoffs - gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md - dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics) - start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding AskUserQuestion gaps filled: - balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations - hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation - sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run) - team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate - design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect All 9 team-* skills: - Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected) - team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/) - team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent - team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list - team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories) - team-release NO-GO override captures written justification - team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED Other fixes: - Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs) - AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md - design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added; mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode - story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware - create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance - consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run - retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call - smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback - Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md - gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification tool-action requirement all added Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo] in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting), contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day coordinated disclosure timeline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements, the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format, and platform compatibility requirements. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate, entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across 7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes (#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.8 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, user-invocable, allowed-tools, model, agent
| name | description | argument-hint | user-invocable | allowed-tools | model | agent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| create-epics | Translate approved GDDs + architecture into epics — one epic per architectural module. Defines scope, governing ADRs, engine risk, and untraced requirements. Does NOT break into stories — run /create-stories [epic-slug] after each epic is created. | [system-name | layer: foundation|core|feature|presentation | all] [--review full|lean|solo] | true | Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Task, AskUserQuestion | sonnet | technical-director |
Create Epics
An epic is a named, bounded body of work that maps to one architectural module. It defines what needs to be built and who owns it architecturally. It does not prescribe implementation steps — that is the job of stories.
Run this skill once per layer as you approach that layer in development. Do not create Feature layer epics until Core is nearly complete — the design will have changed.
Output: production/epics/[epic-slug]/EPIC.md + production/epics/index.md
Next step after each epic: /create-stories [epic-slug]
When to run: After /create-control-manifest and /architecture-review pass.
1. Parse Arguments
Resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
- If
--review [full|lean|solo]was passed → use that - Else read
production/review-mode.txt→ use that value - Else → default to
lean
See .claude/docs/director-gates.md for the full check pattern.
Modes:
/create-epics all— process all systems in layer order/create-epics layer: foundation— Foundation layer only/create-epics layer: core— Core layer only/create-epics layer: feature— Feature layer only/create-epics layer: presentation— Presentation layer only/create-epics [system-name]— one specific system- No argument — ask: "Which layer or system would you like to create epics for?"
2. Load Inputs
Step 2a — Summary scan (fast)
Grep all GDDs for their ## Summary sections before reading anything fully:
Grep pattern="## Summary" glob="design/gdd/*.md" output_mode="content" -A 5
For layer: or [system-name] modes: filter to only in-scope GDDs based on
the Summary quick-reference. Skip full-reading anything out of scope.
Step 2b — Full document load (in-scope systems only)
Using the Step 2a grep results, identify which systems are in scope. Read full documents only for in-scope systems — do not read GDDs or ADRs for out-of-scope systems or layers.
Read for in-scope systems:
design/gdd/systems-index.md— authoritative system list, layers, priority- In-scope GDDs only (Approved or Designed status, filtered by Step 2a results)
docs/architecture/architecture.md— module ownership and API boundaries- Accepted ADRs whose domains cover in-scope systems only — read the "GDD Requirements Addressed", "Decision", and "Engine Compatibility" sections; skip ADRs for unrelated domains
docs/architecture/control-manifest.md— manifest version date from headerdocs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml— for tracing requirements to ADR coveragedocs/engine-reference/[engine]/VERSION.md— engine name, version, risk levels
Report: "Loaded [N] GDDs, [M] ADRs, engine: [name + version]."
3. Processing Order
Process in dependency-safe layer order:
- Foundation (no dependencies)
- Core (depends on Foundation)
- Feature (depends on Core)
- Presentation (depends on Feature + Core)
Within each layer, use the order from systems-index.md.
4. Define Each Epic
For each system, map it to an architectural module from architecture.md.
Check ADR coverage against the TR registry:
- Traced requirements: TR-IDs that have an Accepted ADR covering them
- Untraced requirements: TR-IDs with no ADR — warn before proceeding
Present to user before writing anything:
## Epic: [System Name]
**Layer**: [Foundation / Core / Feature / Presentation]
**GDD**: design/gdd/[filename].md
**Architecture Module**: [module name from architecture.md]
**Governing ADRs**: [ADR-NNNN, ADR-MMMM]
**Engine Risk**: [LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH — highest risk among governing ADRs]
**GDD Requirements Covered by ADRs**: [N / total]
**Untraced Requirements**: [list TR-IDs with no ADR, or "None"]
If there are untraced requirements:
"⚠️ [N] requirements in [system] have no ADR. The epic can be created, but stories for these requirements will be marked Blocked until ADRs exist. Run
/architecture-decisionfirst, or proceed with placeholders."
Use AskUserQuestion:
- Prompt: "Shall I create Epic: [name]?"
- Options:
[A] Yes, create it[B] Skip this epic[C] Pause — I need to write ADRs first
4b. Producer Epic Structure Gate
Review mode check — apply before spawning PR-EPIC:
solo→ skip. Note: "PR-EPIC skipped — Solo mode." Proceed to Step 5 (write epic files).lean→ skip (not a PHASE-GATE). Note: "PR-EPIC skipped — Lean mode." Proceed to Step 5 (write epic files).full→ spawn as normal.
After all epics for the current layer are defined (Step 4 completed for all in-scope systems), and before writing any files, spawn producer via Task using gate PR-EPIC (.claude/docs/director-gates.md).
Pass: the full epic structure summary (all epics, their scope summaries, governing ADR counts), the layer being processed, milestone timeline and team capacity.
Present the producer's assessment.
If UNREALISTIC: offer to revise epic boundaries (split overscoped or merge underscoped epics). Revise and re-run the gate before writing.
If CONCERNS, use AskUserQuestion:
- Prompt: "Producer raised concerns about the epic structure. How do you want to proceed?"
- Options:
[A] Proceed as planned — I accept the producer's concerns[B] Revise epic boundaries — split or merge as recommended[C] Stop — I want to reconsider the scope
If [A]: proceed to Step 5. If [B]: revise epic definitions from Step 4 and re-run the producer gate. If [C]: stop. Verdict: BLOCKED — user wants to reconsider epic scope.
Do not write epic files until the producer gate resolves.
5. Write Epic Files
After approval, ask: "May I write the epic file to production/epics/[epic-slug]/EPIC.md?"
After user confirms, write:
production/epics/[epic-slug]/EPIC.md
# Epic: [System Name]
> **Layer**: [Foundation / Core / Feature / Presentation]
> **GDD**: design/gdd/[filename].md
> **Architecture Module**: [module name]
> **Status**: Ready
> **Stories**: Not yet created — run `/create-stories [epic-slug]`
## Overview
[1 paragraph describing what this epic implements, derived from the GDD Overview
and the architecture module's stated responsibilities]
## Governing ADRs
| ADR | Decision Summary | Engine Risk |
|-----|-----------------|-------------|
| ADR-NNNN: [title] | [1-line summary] | LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH |
## GDD Requirements
| TR-ID | Requirement | ADR Coverage |
|-------|-------------|--------------|
| TR-[system]-001 | [requirement text from registry] | ADR-NNNN ✅ |
| TR-[system]-002 | [requirement text] | ❌ No ADR |
## Definition of Done
This epic is complete when:
- All stories are implemented, reviewed, and closed via `/story-done`
- All acceptance criteria from `design/gdd/[filename].md` are verified
- All Logic and Integration stories have passing test files in `tests/`
- All Visual/Feel and UI stories have evidence docs with sign-off in `production/qa/evidence/`
## Next Step
Run `/create-stories [epic-slug]` to break this epic into implementable stories.
Update production/epics/index.md
Create or update the master index:
# Epics Index
Last Updated: [date]
Engine: [name + version]
| Epic | Layer | System | GDD | Stories | Status |
|------|-------|--------|-----|---------|--------|
| [name] | Foundation | [system] | [file] | Not yet created | Ready |
6. Gate-Check Reminder
After writing all epics for the requested scope:
- Foundation + Core complete: These are required for the Pre-Production →
Production gate. Run
/gate-check productionto check readiness. - Reminder: Epics define scope. Stories define implementation steps. Run
/create-stories [epic-slug]for each epic before developers can pick up work.
Collaborative Protocol
- One epic at a time — present each epic definition before asking to create it
- Warn on gaps — flag untraced requirements before proceeding
- Ask before writing — per-epic approval before writing any file
- No invention — all content comes from GDDs, ADRs, and architecture docs
- Never create stories — this skill stops at the epic level
After all requested epics are processed:
- Verdict: COMPLETE — [N] epic(s) written. Run
/create-stories [epic-slug]per epic. - Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined all epics, or no eligible systems found.