mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-06-27 04:51:46 +00:00
- NEW /content-audit skill: GDD-specified content vs implemented content gap report with COMPLETE/IN PROGRESS/EARLY/NOT STARTED per system - balance-check: Fix & Verify Cycle phase (fix → re-verify → propagate-design-change) - perf-profile: Scope & Timeline Decision phase for M/L effort optimizations - playtest-report: Action Routing phase categorizes findings → design/balance/bugs/polish - review-all-gdds: Phase 4 Cross-System Scenario Walkthrough (multi-system sequences) - story-done: Test-Criterion Traceability (each AC mapped to a test, BLOCKING if >50% untested) - code-review: ADR Compliance Check (ARCHITECTURAL VIOLATION / ADR DRIFT / MINOR DEVIATION) - setup-engine: upgrade subcommand (pre-upgrade API scan, migration plan, VERSION.md update) - story-readiness: Asset References Check (verifies referenced asset paths exist) - validate-assets.sh: invalid JSON now exits 1 (blocking); naming issues exit 0 (warning) - workflow-catalog.yaml + sprint-plan: /scope-check wired into production phase Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.3 KiB
3.3 KiB
name, description, argument-hint, user-invocable, allowed-tools, context, agent
| name | description | argument-hint | user-invocable | allowed-tools | context | agent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| balance-check | Analyzes game balance data files, formulas, and configuration to identify outliers, broken progressions, degenerate strategies, and economy imbalances. Use after modifying any balance-related data or design. | [system-name|path-to-data-file] | true | Read, Glob, Grep | fork | Explore |
When this skill is invoked:
-
Identify the balance domain from the argument.
-
Read relevant data files from
assets/data/anddesign/balance/. -
Read the design document for the system being checked from
design/gdd/. -
Perform analysis:
For combat balance:
- Calculate DPS for all weapons/abilities at each power tier
- Check time-to-kill at each tier
- Identify any options that dominate all others (strictly better)
- Check if defensive options can create unkillable states
- Verify damage type/resistance interactions are balanced
For economy balance:
- Map all resource faucets and sinks with flow rates
- Project resource accumulation over time
- Check for infinite resource loops
- Verify gold sinks scale with gold generation
- Check if any items are never worth purchasing
For progression balance:
- Plot the XP curve and power curve
- Check for dead zones (no meaningful progression for too long)
- Check for power spikes (sudden jumps in capability)
- Verify content gates align with expected player power
- Check if skip/grind strategies break intended pacing
For loot balance:
- Calculate expected time to acquire each rarity tier
- Check pity timer math
- Verify no loot is strictly useless at any stage
- Check inventory pressure vs acquisition rate
-
Output the analysis:
## Balance Check: [System Name]
### Data Sources Analyzed
- [List of files read]
### Health Summary: [HEALTHY / CONCERNS / CRITICAL ISSUES]
### Outliers Detected
| Item/Value | Expected Range | Actual | Issue |
|-----------|---------------|--------|-------|
### Degenerate Strategies Found
- [Strategy description and why it is problematic]
### Progression Analysis
[Graph description or table showing progression curve health]
### Recommendations
| Priority | Issue | Suggested Fix | Impact |
|----------|-------|--------------|--------|
### Values That Need Attention
[Specific values with suggested adjustments and rationale]
-
Fix & Verify Cycle
After presenting the report, ask:
"Would you like to fix any of these balance issues now?"
If yes:
- Ask which issue to address first (refer to the Recommendations table by priority row)
- Guide the user to update the relevant data file in
assets/data/or formula indesign/balance/ - After each fix, offer to re-run the relevant balance checks for that system to verify the fix did not introduce new outliers or degenerate interactions
- If the fix changes a tuning knob that is defined in a GDD or referenced by an ADR, remind the user:
"This value is defined in a design document. Run
/propagate-design-change [path]on the affected GDD to find downstream impacts before committing."
If no:
- Summarize the open issues and suggest saving the report to
design/balance/balance-check-[system]-[date].mdfor later.
End with:
"Re-run
/balance-checkafter fixes to verify."