DonchitosandClaude Opus 5
d05699707f
`project.yaml` at the repo root is now the single source of truth for a project's configuration, replacing `production/stage.txt`, `production/review-mode.txt` and `.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md` (all three still read as a fallback; nothing is force-deleted). **`modes.rigor` — one question instead of six.** `minimal`, `standard` or `full` fronts six knobs: `modes.workflow`, `docs.density`, `qa.level`, `modes.story_granularity`, `modes.review_mode` and `team.size`. It defaults to `minimal`, which is a change from 1.0's behaviour: the heavier tier was measured costing several times more to reach working code without producing a better result, and returning nothing when a fresh developer inherited the project. Pin `modes.rigor: standard` to keep 1.0's process level. Also in this release: - `/settings` to view or change any setting, and `project.local.yaml` for per-developer preferences that should not be committed. - `system_overrides` to hold one system to a higher standard than the rest of the project, and `testing.strict` to set per test type whether missing evidence blocks a story or warns. - A story that changes anything the player sees is not closed until the game has been launched, observed, and a screenshot retained in `production/qa/evidence/`. A parse check is not a run. This holds at every rigor level, including `minimal`, where automated tests are waived but the look is not. - The code root is engine-specific and enforced as such: Godot `src/`, Unity `Assets/`, Unreal `Source/<Module>/`. Two of the three will not build a project laid out any other way. - Migration tooling for existing projects: `.claude/scripts/migrate-v1-config.sh` converts a 1.0 layout, non-destructively by default, with a report to review before `--finalize` deletes anything. - Ask-before-write holds regardless of personal automation settings. Upgrading from 1.0 or earlier: see UPGRADING.md. Full list of changes: CHANGELOG.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016xvzG3i7pWQg4LjyDwWMXd
1.0 KiB
Gate definition. The spawning skill passes this file's path to the director agent; the AGENT reads it — the parent session should not.
LP-CODE-REVIEW — Lead Programmer Code Review
Agent: lead-programmer | Model tier: Sonnet (Tier 2 lead — invoked when a domain specialist's feasibility sign-off is needed)
Trigger: After a dev story is implemented (/dev-story, /story-done), or
as part of /code-review
Context to pass:
- Implementation file paths
- Story file path (for acceptance criteria)
- Relevant GDD section
- ADR that governs this system
Prompt:
"Review this implementation against the story acceptance criteria and governing ADR. Does the code match the architecture boundary definitions? Are there violations of the coding standards or forbidden patterns? Is the public API testable and documented? Are there any correctness issues against the GDD rules? Return APPROVE, CONCERNS [specific issues], or REJECT [must be revised before merge]."
Verdicts: APPROVE / CONCERNS / REJECT