Files
Donchitos 984023ddac Release v1.0.0 — concept-prototype/vertical-slice split, workflow restructure, polish (#50)
* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration

- Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate)
- Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1)
  vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS
- Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows
- Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates
- Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map,
  and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline
- Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* sync v1 counts + polish

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts

- /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no
  existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes
  design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively
- /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description
  when no source doc exists, rather than failing
- /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when
  absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact
- /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured
  option capture at key authoring decision points
- workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec
  min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with
  updated descriptions
- .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills

Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option
prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all.

Skills patched:
- create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict
- sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options
- milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement
- retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B]
- quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect
- tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture
- regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect
- hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins

Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective,
quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields

- WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73),
  add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4),
  replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists,
  add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy,
  fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/
- coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note
- quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic"
- skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section
- All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps

Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files.

Pre-production flow:
- Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B
  (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion
- /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and
  create-architecture handoffs
- gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md
- dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics)
- start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding

AskUserQuestion gaps filled:
- balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check
  all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations
- hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation
- sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run)
- team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate
- design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect

All 9 team-* skills:
- Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected)
- team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/)
- team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent
- team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list
- team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories)
- team-release NO-GO override captures written justification
- team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED

Other fixes:
- Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs)
- AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md
- design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added;
  mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode
- story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware
- create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance
- consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run
- retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call
- smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback
- Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md
- gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification
  tool-action requirement all added

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills

All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution
internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo]
in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy

Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting),
contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day
coordinated disclosure timeline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines

Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements,
the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format,
and platform compatibility requirements.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md

Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate,
entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across
7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes
(#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-13 20:15:08 +10:00

7.7 KiB

name, description, argument-hint, user-invocable, allowed-tools, model
name description argument-hint user-invocable allowed-tools model
bug-triage Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization. [sprint | full | trend] true Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit sonnet

Bug Triage

This skill processes the open bug backlog into a prioritised, sprint-assigned action list. It distinguishes between severity (how bad is the impact?) and priority (how urgently must we fix it?), detects systemic trends, and ensures no critical bug is lost between sprints.

Output: production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md

When to run:

  • Sprint start — assign open bugs to the new sprint or backlog
  • After /team-qa completes and new bugs have been filed
  • When the bug count crosses 10+ open items

1. Parse Arguments

Modes:

  • /bug-triage sprint — triage against the current sprint; assign fixable bugs to the sprint backlog; defer the rest
  • /bug-triage full — full triage of all bugs regardless of sprint scope
  • /bug-triage trend — trend analysis only (no assignment); read-only report
  • No argument — run sprint mode if a current sprint exists, else full mode

2. Load Bug Backlog

Step 2a — Discover bug files

Glob for bug reports in priority order:

  1. production/qa/bugs/*.md — individual bug report files (preferred format)
  2. production/qa/bugs.md — single consolidated bug log (fallback)
  3. Any production/qa/qa-plan-*.md "Bugs Found" table (last resort)

If no bug files found:

"No bug files found in production/qa/bugs/. If bugs are tracked in a different location, adjust the glob pattern. If no bugs exist yet, there is nothing to triage."

Stop and report. Do not proceed if no bugs exist.

Step 2b — Load sprint context

Read the most recently modified file in production/sprints/ to understand:

  • Current sprint number / name
  • Stories in scope (for assignment target)
  • Sprint capacity constraints (if noted)

If no sprint file exists: note "No sprint plan found — assigning to backlog only."

Step 2c — Load severity reference

Read .claude/docs/coding-standards.md for severity/priority definitions if they exist. If they do not exist, use the standard definitions in Step 3.


3. Classify Each Bug

For each bug, extract or infer:

Severity (impact of the bug)

Severity Definition
S1 — Critical Game crashes, data loss, or complete feature failure. Cannot proceed past this point.
S2 — High Major feature broken but game is still playable. Significant wrong behaviour.
S3 — Medium Feature degraded but a workaround exists. Minor wrong behaviour.
S4 — Low Visual glitch, cosmetic issue, typo. No gameplay impact.

Priority (urgency of the fix)

Priority Definition
P1 — Fix this sprint Blocks QA, blocks release, or is regression from last sprint
P2 — Fix soon Should be resolved before the next major milestone
P3 — Backlog Would be good to fix, but no active blocking impact
P4 — Won't fix / Deferred Accepted risk or out of scope for current product scope

Assignment

For each P1/P2 bug in sprint mode:

  • Identify which story or epic the fix belongs to
  • Check whether the current sprint has remaining capacity
  • If capacity exists: assign to sprint (Sprint: [current])
  • If capacity is full: flag as Priority overflow — consider pulling from sprint

For full mode: assign all P1 to current sprint, P2 to next sprint estimate, P3+ to backlog.

Deviation check

Flag bugs that suggest systematic problems:

  • 3+ bugs from the same system in the same sprint → "Potential design or implementation quality issue in [system]"
  • 2+ S1/S2 bugs in the same story → "Story may need to be reopened and re-reviewed before shipping"
  • Bug filed against a story marked Complete → "Regression in completed story — story should be re-opened in sprint tracking"

4. Trend Analysis

After classifying all bugs, generate trend metrics:

  • Total open bugs: [N]
  • Opened this sprint: [N]
  • Closed this sprint: [N]
  • Net change: [+N / -N]

System hot spots

  • Which system has the most open bugs?
  • Which system has the highest S1/S2 ratio?

Age analysis

  • How many bugs are older than 2 sprints?
  • Are any S1/S2 bugs un-assigned (sprint = none)?

Regression indicator

  • Any bugs filed against previously-completed stories?
  • Count: [N] regression bugs (story reopened implied)

5. Generate Triage Report

# Bug Triage Report

> **Date**: [date]
> **Mode**: [sprint | full | trend]
> **Generated by**: /bug-triage
> **Open bugs processed**: [N]
> **Sprint in scope**: [sprint name, or "N/A"]

---

## Triage Summary

| Priority | Count | Notes |
|----------|-------|-------|
| P1 — Fix this sprint | [N] | [N] assigned to sprint, [N] overflow |
| P2 — Fix soon | [N] | Scheduled for next sprint |
| P3 — Backlog | [N] | Deferred |
| P4 — Won't fix | [N] | Accepted risk |

**Critical (S1/S2) unfixed count**: [N]

---

## P1 Bugs — Fix This Sprint

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Assigned to | Story |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|-------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | [sprint] | [story path] |

---

## P2 Bugs — Fix Soon

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Target Sprint |
|----|--------|----------|---------|---------------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S[1-4] | [one-line description] | Sprint [N+1] |

---

## P3/P4 Bugs — Backlog / Won't Fix

| ID | System | Severity | Summary | Disposition |
|----|--------|----------|---------|-------------|
| BUG-NNN | [system] | S4 | [one-line description] | Backlog |

---

## Systemic Issues Flagged

[List any patterns from Step 3 deviation check, or "None identified."]

---

## Trend Analysis

**Volume**: [N] open / [+N] net change this sprint
**Hot spot**: [system with most bugs]
**Regressions**: [N] bugs against completed stories
**Aged bugs (>2 sprints old)**: [N]

[If N aged S1/S2 bugs > 0:]
> ⚠️ [N] high-severity bugs have been open for more than 2 sprints without
> assignment. These represent accepted risk that should be explicitly reviewed.

---

## Recommended Actions

1. [Most urgent action — usually "fix P1 bugs before QA hand-off"]
2. [Second action — usually "investigate [hot spot system] quality"]
3. [Third action — optional improvement]

6. Write and Gate

Present the report in conversation, then ask:

"May I write this triage report to production/qa/bug-triage-[date].md?"

Write only after approval.

After writing:

  • If any S1 bugs are unassigned: "S1 bugs must be assigned before the sprint can be considered healthy. Run /sprint-status to see current capacity."
  • If regression bugs exist: "Regressions found — consider re-opening the affected stories in sprint tracking and running /smoke-check to re-gate."
  • If no P1 bugs exist: "No P1 bugs — build is in good shape for QA hand-off." Verdict: COMPLETE — triage report written.

If user declined write: Verdict: BLOCKED — user declined write.


Collaborative Protocol

  • Never close or mark bugs Won't Fix without user approval — surface them as P4 candidates and ask: "Are these acceptable as Won't Fix?"
  • Never auto-assign to a sprint at capacity — flag overflow and let the sprint owner decide what to pull
  • Severity is objective; priority is a team decision — present severity classifications as recommendations, not mandates
  • Trend data is informational — do not block work on trend findings alone; surface them as observations