mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-06-27 04:51:46 +00:00
* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration - Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate) - Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1) vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS - Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows - Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates - Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map, and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline - Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * sync v1 counts + polish Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts - /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively - /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description when no source doc exists, rather than failing - /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact - /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured option capture at key authoring decision points - workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with updated descriptions - .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all. Skills patched: - create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict - sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options - milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement - retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B] - quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect - tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture - regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect - hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective, quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields - WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73), add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4), replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists, add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy, fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/ - coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note - quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic" - skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section - All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files. Pre-production flow: - Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion - /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and create-architecture handoffs - gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md - dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics) - start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding AskUserQuestion gaps filled: - balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations - hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation - sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run) - team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate - design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect All 9 team-* skills: - Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected) - team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/) - team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent - team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list - team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories) - team-release NO-GO override captures written justification - team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED Other fixes: - Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs) - AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md - design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added; mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode - story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware - create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance - consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run - retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call - smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback - Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md - gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification tool-action requirement all added Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo] in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting), contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day coordinated disclosure timeline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements, the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format, and platform compatibility requirements. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate, entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across 7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes (#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
141 lines
7.3 KiB
Markdown
141 lines
7.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: team-polish
|
|
description: "Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality."
|
|
argument-hint: "[feature or area to polish] [--review full|lean|solo]"
|
|
user-invocable: true
|
|
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite
|
|
model: sonnet
|
|
---
|
|
If no argument is provided, output usage guidance and exit without spawning any agents:
|
|
> Usage: `/team-polish [feature or area]` — specify the feature or area to polish (e.g., `combat`, `main menu`, `inventory system`, `level-1`). Do not use `AskUserQuestion` here; output the guidance directly.
|
|
|
|
When this skill is invoked with an argument, orchestrate the polish team through a structured pipeline.
|
|
|
|
**Decision Points:** At each phase transition, use `AskUserQuestion` to present
|
|
the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's
|
|
full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels.
|
|
The user must approve before moving to the next phase.
|
|
|
|
## Phase 0: Resolve Review Mode
|
|
|
|
1. If `--review [mode]` was passed as an argument, use that mode.
|
|
2. Else read `production/review-mode.txt` — use whatever is written there.
|
|
3. Else default to `lean`.
|
|
|
|
Modes:
|
|
- `full` — spawn all director and lead gates as described
|
|
- `lean` — skip director gates unless they are PHASE-GATE type (CD-PHASE-GATE, TD-PHASE-GATE, PR-PHASE-GATE, AD-PHASE-GATE)
|
|
- `solo` — skip all director gate spawning entirely; run the skill without any agent gates
|
|
|
|
Store the resolved mode for use in all subsequent phases.
|
|
|
|
**Director gate skip rule**: Before spawning any Tier 1 director or lead for review (outside of PHASE-GATE triggers), apply the resolved mode: skip if solo mode; skip if lean mode and this is not a PHASE-GATE.
|
|
|
|
## Team Composition
|
|
- **performance-analyst** — Profiling, optimization, memory analysis, frame budget
|
|
- **engine-programmer** — Engine-level bottlenecks: rendering pipeline, memory, resource loading (invoke when performance-analyst identifies low-level root causes)
|
|
- **technical-artist** — VFX polish, shader optimization, visual quality
|
|
- **sound-designer** — Audio polish, mixing, ambient layers, feedback sounds
|
|
- **tools-programmer** — Content pipeline tool verification, editor tool stability, automation fixes (invoke when content authoring tools are involved in the polished area)
|
|
- **qa-tester** — Edge case testing, regression testing, soak testing
|
|
|
|
## How to Delegate
|
|
|
|
Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:
|
|
- `subagent_type: performance-analyst` — Profiling, optimization, memory analysis
|
|
- `subagent_type: engine-programmer` — Engine-level fixes for rendering, memory, resource loading
|
|
- `subagent_type: technical-artist` — VFX polish, shader optimization, visual quality
|
|
- `subagent_type: sound-designer` — Audio polish, mixing, ambient layers
|
|
- `subagent_type: tools-programmer` — Content pipeline and editor tool verification
|
|
- `subagent_type: qa-tester` — Edge case testing, regression testing, soak testing
|
|
|
|
Always provide full context in each agent's prompt (target feature/area, performance budgets, known issues). Launch independent agents in parallel where the pipeline allows it (e.g., Phases 3 and 4 can run simultaneously).
|
|
|
|
## Pipeline
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Assessment
|
|
Delegate to **performance-analyst**:
|
|
- Profile the target feature/area using `/perf-profile`
|
|
- Identify performance bottlenecks and frame budget violations
|
|
- Measure memory usage and check for leaks
|
|
- Benchmark against target hardware specs
|
|
- Output: performance report with prioritized optimization list
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Optimization
|
|
Delegate to **performance-analyst** (with relevant programmers as needed):
|
|
- Fix performance hotspots identified in Phase 1
|
|
- Optimize draw calls, reduce overdraw
|
|
- Fix memory leaks and reduce allocation pressure
|
|
- Verify optimizations don't change gameplay behavior
|
|
- Output: optimized code with before/after metrics
|
|
|
|
If Phase 1 identified engine-level root causes (rendering pipeline, resource loading, memory allocator), delegate those fixes to **engine-programmer** in parallel:
|
|
- Optimize hot paths in engine systems
|
|
- Fix allocation pressure in core loops
|
|
- Output: engine-level fixes with profiler validation
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Visual Polish (parallel with Phase 2)
|
|
Delegate to **technical-artist**:
|
|
- Review VFX for quality and consistency with art bible
|
|
- Optimize particle systems and shader effects
|
|
- Add screen shake, camera effects, and visual juice where appropriate
|
|
- Ensure effects degrade gracefully on lower settings
|
|
- Output: polished visual effects
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Audio Polish (parallel with Phase 2)
|
|
Delegate to **sound-designer**:
|
|
- Review audio events for completeness (are any actions missing sound feedback?)
|
|
- Check audio mix levels — nothing too loud or too quiet relative to the mix
|
|
- Add ambient audio layers for atmosphere
|
|
- Verify audio plays correctly with spatial positioning
|
|
- Output: audio polish list and mixing notes
|
|
|
|
### Phase 5: Hardening
|
|
Delegate to **qa-tester**:
|
|
- Test all edge cases: boundary conditions, rapid inputs, unusual sequences
|
|
- Soak test: run the feature for extended periods checking for degradation
|
|
- Stress test: maximum entities, worst-case scenarios
|
|
- Regression test: verify polish changes haven't broken existing functionality
|
|
- Test on minimum spec hardware (if available)
|
|
- Output: test results with any remaining issues
|
|
|
|
### Phase 6: Sign-off
|
|
- Collect results from all team members
|
|
- Compare performance metrics against budgets
|
|
- Report: READY FOR RELEASE / NEEDS MORE WORK
|
|
- List any remaining issues with severity and recommendations
|
|
|
|
## Error Recovery Protocol
|
|
|
|
If any spawned agent (via Task) returns BLOCKED, errors, or cannot complete:
|
|
|
|
1. **Surface immediately**: Report "[AgentName]: BLOCKED — [reason]" to the user before continuing to dependent phases
|
|
2. **Assess dependencies**: Check whether the blocked agent's output is required by subsequent phases. If yes, do not proceed past that dependency point without user input.
|
|
3. **Offer options** via AskUserQuestion with choices:
|
|
- Skip this agent and note the gap in the final report
|
|
- Retry with narrower scope
|
|
- Stop here and resolve the blocker first
|
|
4. **Always produce a partial report** — output whatever was completed. Never discard work because one agent blocked.
|
|
|
|
Common blockers:
|
|
- Input file missing (story not found, GDD absent) → redirect to the skill that creates it
|
|
- ADR status is Proposed → do not implement; run `/architecture-decision` first
|
|
- Scope too large → split into two stories via `/create-stories`
|
|
- Conflicting instructions between ADR and story → surface the conflict, do not guess
|
|
|
|
## File Write Protocol
|
|
|
|
All file writes (performance reports, test results, evidence docs) are delegated to
|
|
sub-agents spawned via Task. Each sub-agent enforces the "May I write to [path]?"
|
|
protocol. This orchestrator does not write files directly.
|
|
|
|
## Output
|
|
|
|
A summary report covering: performance before/after metrics, visual polish changes, audio polish changes, test results, and release readiness assessment.
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
- If READY FOR RELEASE: run `/release-checklist` for the final pre-release validation.
|
|
- If NEEDS MORE WORK: schedule remaining issues in `/sprint-plan update` and re-run `/team-polish` after fixes.
|
|
- Run `/gate-check` for a formal phase gate verdict before handing off to release.
|