mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-06-27 04:51:46 +00:00
984023ddac
* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration - Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate) - Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1) vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS - Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows - Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates - Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map, and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline - Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * sync v1 counts + polish Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts - /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively - /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description when no source doc exists, rather than failing - /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact - /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured option capture at key authoring decision points - workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with updated descriptions - .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all. Skills patched: - create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict - sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options - milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement - retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B] - quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect - tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture - regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect - hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective, quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields - WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73), add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4), replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists, add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy, fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/ - coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note - quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic" - skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section - All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files. Pre-production flow: - Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion - /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and create-architecture handoffs - gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md - dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics) - start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding AskUserQuestion gaps filled: - balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations - hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation - sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run) - team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate - design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect All 9 team-* skills: - Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected) - team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/) - team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent - team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list - team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories) - team-release NO-GO override captures written justification - team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED Other fixes: - Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs) - AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md - design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added; mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode - story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware - create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance - consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run - retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call - smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback - Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md - gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification tool-action requirement all added Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo] in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting), contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day coordinated disclosure timeline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements, the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format, and platform compatibility requirements. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate, entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across 7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes (#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
22 KiB
22 KiB
Skill Flow Diagrams
Visual maps of how skills chain together across the 7 development phases. These show what runs before and after each skill, and what artifacts flow between them.
Full Pipeline Overview (Zero to Ship)
PHASE 1: CONCEPT
/start ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────► routes to A/B/C/D
/brainstorm ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/game-concept.md
/setup-engine ────────────────────────────────────────────────► CLAUDE.md + technical-preferences.md
/prototype [core-mechanic] ───────────────────────────────────► prototypes/[name]-concept/REPORT.md
│ PROCEED (validate idea BEFORE writing GDDs)
▼
/design-review [game-concept.md] ────────────────────────────► concept validated
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to systems-design
│
▼
PHASE 2: SYSTEMS DESIGN
/map-systems ────────────────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/systems-index.md
│
▼ (for each system, in dependency order)
/design-system [name] ──────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/[system].md
/design-review [system].md ─────────────────────────────────► per-GDD review comments
│
▼ (after all MVP GDDs done)
/review-all-gdds ────────────────────────────────────────────► design/gdd/gdd-cross-review-[date].md
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to technical-setup
│
▼
PHASE 3: TECHNICAL SETUP
/create-architecture ────────────────────────────────────────► docs/architecture/master.md
/architecture-decision (×N) ─────────────────────────────────► docs/architecture/[adr-nnn].md
/architecture-review ────────────────────────────────────────► review report + docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml
/create-control-manifest ────────────────────────────────────► docs/architecture/control-manifest.md
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to pre-production
│
▼
PHASE 4: PRE-PRODUCTION
[UX — before epics, so specs exist when stories are written]
/ux-design [screen/hud/patterns] ────────────────────────────► design/ux/*.md
/ux-review ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► UX specs approved (HARD gate for /team-ui)
[Test infrastructure — scaffold before stories reference tests]
/test-setup ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► test framework + CI/CD pipeline
/test-helpers ───────────────────────────────────────────────► tests/helpers/[engine-specific].gd
[Vertical slice — before epics, validate full game loop]
/vertical-slice ─────────────────────────────────────────────► prototypes/[name]-vertical-slice/REPORT.md
/playtest-report ────────────────────────────────────────────► production/playtests/
[Stories + sprint plan — only after vertical slice PROCEEDS]
/create-epics [layer] ───────────────────────────────────────► production/epics/*/EPIC.md
/create-stories [epic-slug] ─────────────────────────────────► production/epics/*/story-*.md
/sprint-plan new ────────────────────────────────────────────► production/sprints/sprint-01.md
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to production
│
▼
PHASE 5: PRODUCTION (repeating sprint loop)
/sprint-status ──────────────────────────────────────────────► sprint snapshot
/story-readiness [story] ────────────────────────────────────► story validated READY
│
▼ (pick up and implement)
/dev-story [story] ──────────────────────────────────────────► routes to correct programmer agent
│
▼ (during implementation, as needed)
/code-review ────────────────────────────────────────────────► code review report
/scope-check ────────────────────────────────────────────────► scope creep detected / clear
/content-audit ──────────────────────────────────────────────► GDD content gaps identified
/bug-report ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► production/qa/bugs/bug-NNN.md
/bug-triage ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► bugs re-prioritized + assigned
[Team skills for feature areas — spawn when working a full feature]
/team-combat / /team-narrative / /team-ui / /team-level / /team-audio
[QA cycle per sprint]
/qa-plan ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► production/qa/qa-plan-sprint-NN.md
/smoke-check ────────────────────────────────────────────────► smoke test gate (PASS/FAIL)
/regression-suite ───────────────────────────────────────────► coverage gaps + missing regression tests
/test-evidence-review ───────────────────────────────────────► evidence quality report
/test-flakiness ─────────────────────────────────────────────► flaky test report
│
▼
/story-done [story] ─────────────────────────────────────────► story closed + next surfaced
/sprint-plan [next] ─────────────────────────────────────────► next sprint
│
▼ (after Production milestone)
/milestone-review ───────────────────────────────────────────► milestone report
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to polish
│
▼
PHASE 6: POLISH
/perf-profile ───────────────────────────────────────────────► perf report + fixes
/balance-check ──────────────────────────────────────────────► balance report + fixes
/asset-audit ────────────────────────────────────────────────► asset compliance report
/tech-debt ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► docs/tech-debt-register.md
/soak-test ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► soak test protocol + results
/localize ───────────────────────────────────────────────────► localization readiness report
/team-polish ────────────────────────────────────────────────► polish sprint orchestrated
/team-qa ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► full QA cycle sign-off
/gate-check ─────────────────────────────────────────────────► PASS → advance to release
│
▼
PHASE 7: RELEASE
/launch-checklist ───────────────────────────────────────────► launch readiness report
/release-checklist ──────────────────────────────────────────► platform-specific checklist
/changelog ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► CHANGELOG.md
/patch-notes ────────────────────────────────────────────────► player-facing notes
/team-release ───────────────────────────────────────────────► release pipeline orchestrated
│
▼ (post-launch, ongoing)
/hotfix ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────► emergency fix with audit trail
/team-live-ops ──────────────────────────────────────────────► live-ops content plan
Skill Chain: /design-system in Detail
How a single GDD gets authored, reviewed, and handed to architecture:
systems-index.md (input)
game-concept.md (input)
upstream GDDs (input, if any)
│
▼
/design-system [name]
│
├── Pre-check: feasibility table + engine risk flags
│
├── Section cycle × 8:
│ question → options → decision → draft → approval → WRITE
│ [each section written to file immediately after approval]
│
└── Output: design/gdd/[system].md (complete, all 8 sections)
│
▼
/design-review design/gdd/[system].md
│
├── APPROVED → mark DONE in systems-index, proceed to next system
├── NEEDS REVISION → agent shows specific issues, re-enter section cycle
└── MAJOR REVISION → significant redesign needed before next system
│
▼ (after all MVP GDDs + cross-review)
/review-all-gdds
│
└── Output: gdd-cross-review-[date].md
Skill Chain: UX / UI Pipeline in Detail
UX specs are authored in Phase 4 (Pre-Production), before epics are written, so that story acceptance criteria can reference specific UX artifacts.
design/gdd/*.md (UI/UX requirements extracted)
design/player-journey.md (emotional arc, if authored)
│
▼
/ux-design hud → design/ux/hud.md
/ux-design screen [name] → design/ux/screens/[name].md
/ux-design patterns → design/ux/interaction-patterns.md
│
▼
/ux-review design/ux/
│
├── APPROVED → UX specs ready, proceed to /create-epics
├── NEEDS REVISION → blocking issues listed → fix → re-run review
└── MAJOR REVISION → fundamental UX problems → redesign before epics
│
▼ (after APPROVED — in Phase 5 when implementing UI features)
/team-ui
│
├── Phase 1: /ux-design (if any specs still missing) + /ux-review
├── Phase 2: visual design (art-director)
├── Phase 3: layout implementation (ui-programmer)
├── Phase 4: accessibility audit (accessibility-specialist)
└── Phase 5: final review
Note: /ux-design and /ux-review belong in Phase 4 (Pre-Production).
/team-ui belongs in Phase 5 (Production) when a UI feature is being built.
Skill Chain: Dev Story Flow in Detail
How a story moves from backlog to closed:
/story-readiness [story]
│
├── READY → Status: ready-for-dev → pick up for implementation
├── NEEDS WORK → agent shows specific gaps → resolve → re-run readiness
└── BLOCKED → ADR still Proposed, or upstream story incomplete
│
▼ (after READY)
/dev-story [story]
│
├── Reads: story file, linked GDD requirement, ADR decisions, control manifest
├── Routes to: gameplay-programmer / engine-programmer / ui-programmer / etc.
│
└── Implementation begins
│
▼ (optional, during/after implementation)
/code-review → architectural review of changeset
/scope-check → verify no scope creep vs. original story criteria
/test-evidence-review → validate test files and manual evidence quality
│
▼
/story-done [story]
│
├── COMPLETE → Status: Complete, sprint-status.yaml updated, next story surfaced
├── COMPLETE WITH NOTES → complete but some criteria deferred (logged)
└── BLOCKED → acceptance criteria cannot be verified → investigate blocker
Skill Chain: Story Lifecycle (Backlog to Closed)
How a story gets from backlog to closed (summary view):
/create-epics [layer]
│
└── Output: production/epics/[slug]/EPIC.md
│
▼
/create-stories [epic-slug]
│
└── Output: production/epics/[slug]/story-NNN-[slug].md
(Status: Ready or Blocked if ADR is Proposed)
│
▼
/story-readiness [story]
│
├── READY → /dev-story → implement → /story-done
├── NEEDS WORK → resolve gaps → re-run
└── BLOCKED → fix upstream dependency first
Skill Chain: QA Pipeline in Detail
[Phase 4 — one-time infrastructure setup]
/test-setup ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► test framework scaffolded + CI/CD wired
/test-helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────► tests/helpers/[engine].gd (GDUnit4, NUnit, etc.)
[Phase 5 — per-sprint QA cycle]
/qa-plan [sprint or feature]
│
├── Reads: story files, GDDs, acceptance criteria
├── Classifies each story by test type:
│ Logic → automated unit test (BLOCKING)
│ Integration → integration test or documented playtest (BLOCKING)
│ Visual/Feel → screenshot + lead sign-off (ADVISORY)
│ UI → manual walkthrough or interaction test (ADVISORY)
│ Config/Data → smoke check (ADVISORY)
└── Output: production/qa/qa-plan-sprint-NN.md
│
▼
/smoke-check
│
├── PASS → QA hand-off cleared
└── FAIL → block sprint close → fix critical paths first
│
▼
/regression-suite
│
└── Coverage gaps + list of fixed bugs without regression tests
│
▼
/test-evidence-review
│
└── Validates evidence quality, not just existence
│
▼ (if CI run history available)
/test-flakiness
│
└── Flaky test report + fix recommendations
[Phase 6 — extended stability testing]
/soak-test ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────► soak test protocol + observed results
/team-qa ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────► full QA cycle sign-off for release gate
[Ongoing — bug management]
/bug-report ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► production/qa/bugs/bug-NNN.md
/bug-triage ────────────────────────────────────────────────────► open bugs re-prioritized + assigned
[Meta — harness validation]
/skill-test [lint|spec|catalog] ────────────────────────────────► skill file structural + behavioral check
Brownfield Onboarding Flow
For projects with existing work (use /start option D or run directly):
/project-stage-detect → stage detection report
│
▼
/adopt
│
├── Phase 1: detect what exists
├── Phase 2: FORMAT audit (not just existence)
├── Phase 3: classify gaps (BLOCKING / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW)
├── Phase 4: ordered migration plan
├── Phase 5: write docs/adoption-plan-[date].md
└── Phase 6: fix most urgent gap inline (optional)
│
▼
/design-system retrofit [path] → fills missing GDD sections
/architecture-decision retrofit [path] → fills missing ADR sections
/gate-check → where are you in the pipeline?
How to Read These Diagrams
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
──► |
Produces this artifact |
│ ▼ |
Flows into next step |
├── |
Branch (multiple possible outcomes) |
×N |
Runs N times (once per system, story, etc.) |
(input) |
Read by the skill but not produced here |
[optional] |
Not required for the gate to pass |
WRITE (caps) |
File written to disk immediately |
Common Entry Points
| Where you are | Run this |
|---|---|
| Brand new, no idea | /start → /brainstorm |
| Have a concept, no engine | /setup-engine |
| Have concept + engine | /map-systems |
| Mid-systems design | /design-system [next system] or /map-systems next |
| All GDDs done | /review-all-gdds → /gate-check |
| In technical setup | /create-architecture → /architecture-decision |
| Starting UX design | /ux-design screen [name] or /ux-design hud |
| Scaffolding tests | /test-setup → /test-helpers |
| Have stories, ready to code | /story-readiness [story] → /dev-story [story] |
| Story done | /story-done [story] |
| Running QA for a sprint | /qa-plan → /smoke-check → /regression-suite |
| Bug backlog needs sorting | /bug-triage |
| Extended stability testing | /soak-test |
| Not sure | /help |
| Existing project | /adopt |