mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-06-27 13:01:50 +00:00
* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration - Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate) - Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1) vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS - Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows - Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates - Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map, and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline - Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * sync v1 counts + polish Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts - /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively - /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description when no source doc exists, rather than failing - /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact - /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured option capture at key authoring decision points - workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with updated descriptions - .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all. Skills patched: - create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict - sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options - milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement - retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B] - quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect - tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture - regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect - hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective, quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields - WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73), add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4), replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists, add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy, fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/ - coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note - quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic" - skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section - All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files. Pre-production flow: - Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion - /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and create-architecture handoffs - gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md - dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics) - start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding AskUserQuestion gaps filled: - balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations - hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation - sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run) - team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate - design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect All 9 team-* skills: - Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected) - team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/) - team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent - team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list - team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories) - team-release NO-GO override captures written justification - team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED Other fixes: - Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs) - AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md - design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added; mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode - story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware - create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance - consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run - retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call - smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback - Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md - gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification tool-action requirement all added Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo] in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting), contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day coordinated disclosure timeline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements, the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format, and platform compatibility requirements. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate, entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across 7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes (#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
282 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
282 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
# Agent Coordination and Delegation Map
|
|
|
|
## Organizational Hierarchy
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
[Human Developer]
|
|
|
|
|
+---------------+---------------+
|
|
| | |
|
|
creative-director technical-director producer
|
|
| | |
|
|
+--------+--------+ | (coordinates all)
|
|
| | | |
|
|
game-designer art-dir narr-dir lead-programmer qa-lead audio-dir
|
|
| | | | | |
|
|
+--+--+ | +--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+ | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
sys lvl eco ta wrt wrld gp ep ai net tl ui qa-t snd
|
|
|
|
|
+---+---+
|
|
| |
|
|
perf-a devops analytics
|
|
|
|
Additional Leads (report to producer/directors):
|
|
release-manager -- Release pipeline, versioning, deployment
|
|
localization-lead -- i18n, string tables, translation pipeline
|
|
prototyper -- Rapid throwaway prototypes, concept validation
|
|
security-engineer -- Anti-cheat, exploits, data privacy, network security
|
|
accessibility-specialist -- WCAG, colorblind, remapping, text scaling
|
|
live-ops-designer -- Seasons, events, battle passes, retention, live economy
|
|
community-manager -- Patch notes, player feedback, crisis comms
|
|
|
|
Engine Specialists (use the SET matching your engine):
|
|
unreal-specialist -- UE5 lead: Blueprint/C++, GAS overview, UE subsystems
|
|
ue-gas-specialist -- GAS: abilities, effects, attributes, tags, prediction
|
|
ue-blueprint-specialist -- Blueprint: BP/C++ boundary, graph standards, optimization
|
|
ue-replication-specialist -- Networking: replication, RPCs, prediction, bandwidth
|
|
ue-umg-specialist -- UI: UMG, CommonUI, widget hierarchy, data binding
|
|
|
|
unity-specialist -- Unity lead: MonoBehaviour/DOTS, Addressables, URP/HDRP
|
|
unity-dots-specialist -- DOTS/ECS: Jobs, Burst, hybrid renderer
|
|
unity-shader-specialist -- Shaders: Shader Graph, VFX Graph, SRP customization
|
|
unity-addressables-specialist -- Assets: async loading, bundles, memory, CDN
|
|
unity-ui-specialist -- UI: UI Toolkit, UGUI, UXML/USS, data binding
|
|
|
|
godot-specialist -- Godot 4 lead: GDScript, node/scene, signals, resources
|
|
godot-gdscript-specialist -- GDScript: static typing, patterns, signals, performance
|
|
godot-csharp-specialist -- C#: .NET patterns, [Signal] delegates, async, type-safe node access
|
|
godot-shader-specialist -- Shaders: Godot shading language, visual shaders, VFX
|
|
godot-gdextension-specialist -- Native: C++/Rust bindings, GDExtension, build systems
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Legend
|
|
```
|
|
sys = systems-designer gp = gameplay-programmer
|
|
lvl = level-designer ep = engine-programmer
|
|
eco = economy-designer ai = ai-programmer
|
|
ta = technical-artist net = network-programmer
|
|
wrt = writer tl = tools-programmer
|
|
wrld = world-builder ui = ui-programmer
|
|
snd = sound-designer qa-t = qa-tester
|
|
narr-dir = narrative-director perf-a = performance-analyst
|
|
art-dir = art-director
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Delegation Rules
|
|
|
|
### Who Can Delegate to Whom
|
|
|
|
| From | Can Delegate To |
|
|
|------|----------------|
|
|
| creative-director | game-designer, art-director, audio-director, narrative-director |
|
|
| technical-director | lead-programmer, devops-engineer, performance-analyst, technical-artist (technical decisions) |
|
|
| producer | Any agent (task assignment within their domain only) |
|
|
| game-designer | systems-designer, level-designer, economy-designer |
|
|
| lead-programmer | gameplay-programmer, engine-programmer, ai-programmer, network-programmer, tools-programmer, ui-programmer |
|
|
| art-director | technical-artist, ux-designer |
|
|
| audio-director | sound-designer |
|
|
| narrative-director | writer, world-builder |
|
|
| qa-lead | qa-tester |
|
|
| release-manager | devops-engineer (release builds), qa-lead (release testing) |
|
|
| localization-lead | writer (string review), ui-programmer (text fitting) |
|
|
| prototyper | (works independently, reports findings to producer and relevant leads) |
|
|
| security-engineer | network-programmer (security review), lead-programmer (secure patterns) |
|
|
| accessibility-specialist | ux-designer (accessible patterns), ui-programmer (implementation), qa-tester (a11y testing) |
|
|
| [engine]-specialist | engine sub-specialists (delegates subsystem-specific work) |
|
|
| [engine] sub-specialists | (advises all programmers on engine subsystem patterns and optimization) |
|
|
| live-ops-designer | economy-designer (live economy), community-manager (event comms), analytics-engineer (engagement metrics) |
|
|
| community-manager | (works with producer for approval, release-manager for patch note timing) |
|
|
|
|
### Escalation Paths
|
|
|
|
| Situation | Escalate To |
|
|
|-----------|------------|
|
|
| Two designers disagree on a mechanic | game-designer |
|
|
| Game design vs narrative conflict | creative-director |
|
|
| Game design vs technical feasibility | producer (facilitates), then creative-director + technical-director |
|
|
| Art vs audio tonal conflict | creative-director |
|
|
| Code architecture disagreement | technical-director |
|
|
| Cross-system code conflict | lead-programmer, then technical-director |
|
|
| Schedule conflict between departments | producer |
|
|
| Scope exceeds capacity | producer, then creative-director for cuts |
|
|
| Quality gate disagreement | qa-lead, then technical-director |
|
|
| Performance budget violation | performance-analyst flags, technical-director decides |
|
|
|
|
## Common Workflow Patterns
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 1: New Feature (Full Pipeline)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
1. creative-director -- Approves feature concept aligns with vision
|
|
2. game-designer -- Creates design document with full spec
|
|
3. producer -- Schedules work, identifies dependencies
|
|
4. lead-programmer -- Designs code architecture, creates interface sketch
|
|
5. [specialist-programmer] -- Implements the feature
|
|
6. technical-artist -- Implements visual effects (if needed)
|
|
7. writer -- Creates text content (if needed)
|
|
8. sound-designer -- Creates audio event list (if needed)
|
|
9. qa-tester -- Writes test cases
|
|
10. qa-lead -- Reviews and approves test coverage
|
|
11. lead-programmer -- Code review
|
|
12. qa-tester -- Executes tests
|
|
13. producer -- Marks task complete
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 2: Bug Fix
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
1. qa-tester -- Files bug report with /bug-report
|
|
2. qa-lead -- Triages severity and priority
|
|
3. producer -- Assigns to sprint (if not S1)
|
|
4. lead-programmer -- Identifies root cause, assigns to programmer
|
|
5. [specialist-programmer] -- Fixes the bug
|
|
6. lead-programmer -- Code review
|
|
7. qa-tester -- Verifies fix and runs regression
|
|
8. qa-lead -- Closes bug
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 3: Balance Adjustment
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
1. analytics-engineer -- Identifies imbalance from data (or player reports)
|
|
2. game-designer -- Evaluates the issue against design intent
|
|
3. economy-designer -- Models the adjustment
|
|
4. game-designer -- Approves the new values
|
|
5. [data file update] -- Change configuration values
|
|
6. qa-tester -- Regression test affected systems
|
|
7. analytics-engineer -- Monitor post-change metrics
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 4: New Area/Level
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
1. narrative-director -- Defines narrative purpose and beats for the area
|
|
2. world-builder -- Creates lore and environmental context
|
|
3. level-designer -- Designs layout, encounters, pacing
|
|
4. game-designer -- Reviews mechanical design of encounters
|
|
5. art-director -- Defines visual direction for the area
|
|
6. audio-director -- Defines audio direction for the area
|
|
7. [implementation by relevant programmers and artists]
|
|
8. writer -- Creates area-specific text content
|
|
9. qa-tester -- Tests the complete area
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 5: Sprint Cycle
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
1. producer -- Plans sprint with /sprint-plan new
|
|
2. [All agents] -- Execute assigned tasks
|
|
3. producer -- Daily status with /sprint-plan status
|
|
4. qa-lead -- Continuous testing during sprint
|
|
5. lead-programmer -- Continuous code review during sprint
|
|
6. producer -- Sprint retrospective with post-sprint hook
|
|
7. producer -- Plans next sprint incorporating learnings
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 6: Milestone Checkpoint
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
1. producer -- Runs /milestone-review
|
|
2. creative-director -- Reviews creative progress
|
|
3. technical-director -- Reviews technical health
|
|
4. qa-lead -- Reviews quality metrics
|
|
5. producer -- Facilitates go/no-go discussion
|
|
6. [All directors] -- Agree on scope adjustments if needed
|
|
7. producer -- Documents decisions and updates plans
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 7: Release Pipeline
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
1. producer -- Declares release candidate, confirms milestone criteria met
|
|
2. release-manager -- Cuts release branch, generates /release-checklist
|
|
3. qa-lead -- Runs full regression, signs off on quality
|
|
4. localization-lead -- Verifies all strings translated, text fitting passes
|
|
5. performance-analyst -- Confirms performance benchmarks within targets
|
|
6. devops-engineer -- Builds release artifacts, runs deployment pipeline
|
|
7. release-manager -- Generates /changelog, tags release, creates release notes
|
|
8. technical-director -- Final sign-off on major releases
|
|
9. release-manager -- Deploys and monitors for 48 hours
|
|
10. producer -- Marks release complete
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 8: Concept Prototype (early — before GDDs)
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
1. game-designer -- Defines the hypothesis and success criteria
|
|
2. prototyper -- Scaffolds concept prototype with /prototype
|
|
3. prototyper -- Builds minimal implementation (1-3 days)
|
|
4. game-designer -- Evaluates prototype against criteria
|
|
5. prototyper -- Documents findings in REPORT.md
|
|
6. creative-director -- PROCEED / PIVOT / KILL decision (full mode only)
|
|
7. game-designer -- Informs GDD writing with prototype learnings if PROCEED
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 8b: Vertical Slice (pre-production — after GDDs and architecture)
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
1. game-designer -- Confirms slice scope against GDDs
|
|
2. prototyper -- Builds production-quality end-to-end build with /vertical-slice
|
|
3. prototyper -- Conducts internal playtest sessions (minimum 1)
|
|
4. prototyper -- Documents findings in REPORT.md
|
|
5. creative-director -- Go/no-go decision on proceeding to Production (full mode)
|
|
6. producer -- Schedules Production epics/sprints if PROCEED
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Pattern 9: Live Event / Season Launch
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
1. live-ops-designer -- Designs event/season content, rewards, schedule
|
|
2. game-designer -- Validates gameplay mechanics for event
|
|
3. economy-designer -- Balances event economy and reward values
|
|
4. narrative-director -- Provides seasonal narrative theme
|
|
5. writer -- Creates event descriptions and lore
|
|
6. producer -- Schedules implementation work
|
|
7. [implementation by relevant programmers]
|
|
8. qa-lead -- Test event flow end-to-end
|
|
9. community-manager -- Drafts event announcement and patch notes
|
|
10. release-manager -- Deploys event content
|
|
11. analytics-engineer -- Monitors event participation and metrics
|
|
12. live-ops-designer -- Post-event analysis and learnings
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Cross-Domain Communication Protocols
|
|
|
|
### Design Change Notification
|
|
|
|
When a design document changes, the game-designer must notify:
|
|
- lead-programmer (implementation impact)
|
|
- qa-lead (test plan update needed)
|
|
- producer (schedule impact assessment)
|
|
- Relevant specialist agents depending on the change
|
|
|
|
### Architecture Change Notification
|
|
|
|
When an ADR is created or modified, the technical-director must notify:
|
|
- lead-programmer (code changes needed)
|
|
- All affected specialist programmers
|
|
- qa-lead (testing strategy may change)
|
|
- producer (schedule impact)
|
|
|
|
### Asset Standard Change Notification
|
|
|
|
When the art bible or asset standards change, the art-director must notify:
|
|
- technical-artist (pipeline changes)
|
|
- All content creators working with affected assets
|
|
- devops-engineer (if build pipeline is affected)
|
|
|
|
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
|
|
|
1. **Bypassing the hierarchy**: A specialist agent should never make decisions
|
|
that belong to their lead without consultation.
|
|
2. **Cross-domain implementation**: An agent should never modify files outside
|
|
their designated area without explicit delegation from the relevant owner.
|
|
3. **Shadow decisions**: All decisions must be documented. Verbal agreements
|
|
without written records lead to contradictions.
|
|
4. **Monolithic tasks**: Every task assigned to an agent should be completable
|
|
in 1-3 days. If it is larger, it must be broken down first.
|
|
5. **Assumption-based implementation**: If a spec is ambiguous, the implementer
|
|
must ask the specifier rather than guessing. Wrong guesses are more expensive
|
|
than a question.
|