mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-06-27 13:01:50 +00:00
* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration - Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate) - Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1) vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS - Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows - Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates - Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map, and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline - Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * sync v1 counts + polish Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts - /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively - /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description when no source doc exists, rather than failing - /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact - /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured option capture at key authoring decision points - workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with updated descriptions - .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all. Skills patched: - create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict - sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options - milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement - retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B] - quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect - tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture - regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect - hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective, quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields - WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73), add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4), replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists, add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy, fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/ - coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note - quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic" - skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section - All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files. Pre-production flow: - Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion - /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and create-architecture handoffs - gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md - dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics) - start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding AskUserQuestion gaps filled: - balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations - hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation - sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run) - team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate - design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect All 9 team-* skills: - Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected) - team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/) - team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent - team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list - team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories) - team-release NO-GO override captures written justification - team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED Other fixes: - Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs) - AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md - design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added; mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode - story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware - create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance - consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run - retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call - smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback - Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md - gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification tool-action requirement all added Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo] in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting), contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day coordinated disclosure timeline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements, the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format, and platform compatibility requirements. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate, entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across 7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes (#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
67 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
67 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
# Coding Standards
|
|
|
|
- All game code must include doc comments on public APIs
|
|
- Every system must have a corresponding architecture decision record in `docs/architecture/`
|
|
- Gameplay values must be data-driven (external config), never hardcoded
|
|
- All public methods must be unit-testable (dependency injection over singletons)
|
|
- Commits must reference the relevant design document or task ID
|
|
- **Commit messages**: Use Conventional Commits format — `feat:`, `fix:`, `chore:`, `docs:`, `test:`, `refactor:`. Reference the story or task ID in the body (e.g., `Story: EPIC-001-S02`).
|
|
- **Verification-driven development**: Write tests first when adding gameplay systems.
|
|
For UI changes, verify with screenshots. Compare expected output to actual output
|
|
before marking work complete. Every implementation should have a way to prove it works.
|
|
|
|
# Design Document Standards
|
|
|
|
- All design docs use Markdown
|
|
- Each mechanic has a dedicated document in `design/gdd/`
|
|
- Documents must include these 8 required sections:
|
|
1. **Overview** -- one-paragraph summary
|
|
2. **Player Fantasy** -- intended feeling and experience
|
|
3. **Detailed Rules** -- unambiguous mechanics
|
|
4. **Formulas** -- all math defined with variables
|
|
5. **Edge Cases** -- unusual situations handled
|
|
6. **Dependencies** -- other systems listed
|
|
7. **Tuning Knobs** -- configurable values identified
|
|
8. **Acceptance Criteria** -- testable success conditions
|
|
- Balance values must link to their source formula or rationale
|
|
|
|
# Testing Standards
|
|
|
|
## Test Evidence by Story Type
|
|
|
|
All stories must have appropriate test evidence before they can be marked Done:
|
|
|
|
| Story Type | Required Evidence | Location | Gate Level |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| **Logic** (formulas, AI, state machines) | Automated unit test — must pass | `tests/unit/[system]/` | BLOCKING |
|
|
| **Integration** (multi-system) | Integration test OR documented playtest | `tests/integration/[system]/` | BLOCKING |
|
|
| **Visual/Feel** (animation, VFX, feel) | Screenshot + lead sign-off | `production/qa/evidence/` | ADVISORY |
|
|
| **UI** (menus, HUD, screens) | Manual walkthrough doc OR interaction test | `production/qa/evidence/` | ADVISORY |
|
|
| **Config/Data** (balance tuning) | Smoke check pass | `production/qa/smoke-[date].md` | ADVISORY |
|
|
|
|
## Automated Test Rules
|
|
|
|
- **Naming**: `[system]_[feature]_test.[ext]` for files; `test_[scenario]_[expected]` for functions
|
|
- **Determinism**: Tests must produce the same result every run — no random seeds, no time-dependent assertions
|
|
- **Isolation**: Each test sets up and tears down its own state; tests must not depend on execution order
|
|
- **No hardcoded data**: Test fixtures use constant files or factory functions, not inline magic numbers
|
|
(exception: boundary value tests where the exact number IS the point)
|
|
- **Independence**: Unit tests do not call external APIs, databases, or file I/O — use dependency injection
|
|
|
|
## What NOT to Automate
|
|
|
|
- Visual fidelity (shader output, VFX appearance, animation curves)
|
|
- "Feel" qualities (input responsiveness, perceived weight, timing)
|
|
- Platform-specific rendering (test on target hardware, not headlessly)
|
|
- Full gameplay sessions (covered by playtesting, not automation)
|
|
|
|
## CI/CD Rules
|
|
|
|
- Automated test suite runs on every push to main and every PR
|
|
- No merge if tests fail — tests are a blocking gate in CI
|
|
- Never disable or skip failing tests to make CI pass — fix the underlying issue
|
|
- Engine-specific CI commands:
|
|
- **Godot**: `godot --headless --script tests/gdunit4_runner.gd`
|
|
- **Unity**: `game-ci/unity-test-runner@v4` (GitHub Actions)
|
|
- **Unreal**: headless runner with `-nullrhi` flag
|