Files
Claude-Code-Game-Studios/.claude/skills/team-audio/SKILL.md
Donchitos 984023ddac Release v1.0.0 — concept-prototype/vertical-slice split, workflow restructure, polish (#50)
* Add /vertical-slice skill, prototype overhaul, and workflow integration

- Add /vertical-slice skill for pre-production validation (Phase 4 gate)
- Overhaul /prototype skill with two-mode design: concept prototype (Phase 1)
  vs vertical slice (Phase 4), with clearer differentiation and higher standards for VS
- Update prototyper agent to own both prototype and vertical-slice workflows
- Add prototype-report.md and vertical-slice-report.md output templates
- Update WORKFLOW-GUIDE, quick-start, skills-reference, agent-coordination-map,
  and skill-flow-diagrams to fully integrate both skills into the 7-phase pipeline
- Remove orphaned empty quick-prototype/ directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* sync v1 counts + polish

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add entity inventory flow, relax vertical-slice gate, improve UX authoring prompts

- /asset-spec: new Phase 0b entity & screen inventory when no argument and no
  existing inventory — reads GDDs/art-bible, proposes categorized list, writes
  design/assets/entity-inventory.md collaboratively
- /asset-spec: entity/character target falls back to inline user description
  when no source doc exists, rather than failing
- /gate-check: vertical slice changed from blocking to CONCERNS-only when
  absent; built-but-broken slice still fails; adds entity inventory as gate artifact
- /ux-design: convert inline approval prompts to AskUserQuestion for structured
  option capture at key authoring decision points
- workflow-catalog.yaml: entity-inventory step added to pre-production; UX spec
  min_count raised to 3; vertical-slice and prototype marked required: false with
  updated descriptions
- .gitignore: exclude marrow/ eval tooling directory

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add missing AskUserQuestion widgets to 7 skills

Audit found 11 decision points across 7 skills where structured option
prompts were missing — using plain text, auto-selection, or no gate at all.

Skills patched:
- create-epics: per-epic approval + producer CONCERNS verdict
- sprint-plan: producer CONCERNS verdict with scope/timeline options
- milestone-review: AT RISK / OFF TRACK producer verdicts require acknowledgement
- retrospective: existing-retro handling converted from plain text [A]/[B]
- quick-design: classification confirmation + draft approve/revise/redirect
- tech-debt add mode: category (6 options) + effort (S/M/L/XL) structured capture
- regression-suite: no-arg mode selection instead of silent auto-detect
- hotfix: severity confirmation gate before workflow begins

Also added AskUserQuestion to allowed-tools headers for retrospective,
quick-design, tech-debt, regression-suite, and hotfix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Prep v1 stable: fix WORKFLOW-GUIDE counts, stale agent names, and skill model fields

- WORKFLOW-GUIDE.md: correct agent count (48→49), skill count (66/68→73),
  add 6 missing skills to Appendix B, fix Creative category count (2→4),
  replace 3 non-existent agent names with correct ue-*/unity-* specialists,
  add missing godot-csharp/gdextension specialists to hierarchy,
  fix production/stories/ paths → production/epics/
- coordination-rules.md: replace "not yet used" with opt-in env var note
- quick-start.md: rename duplicate "Validate the concept" label → "Prototype the mechanic"
- skill-flow-diagrams.md: remove duplicate legacy UX pipeline section
- All 62 skills missing model: field now have explicit model: sonnet

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: comprehensive skill audit — consistency, UX, and flow gaps

Two-pass audit fixing ~35 bugs across 41 files.

Pre-production flow:
- Brainstorm next-steps split into Path A (design-first) and Path B
  (prototype-first) — eliminates "prototype after architecture" confusion
- /architecture-review added to pre-production flow in brainstorm and
  create-architecture handoffs
- gate-check traceability check corrected to requirements-traceability.md
- dev-story TR registry error now points to /architecture-review (not /create-epics)
- start now writes production/stage.txt on first onboarding

AskUserQuestion gaps filled:
- balance-check, code-review, hotfix, day-one-patch, consistency-check
  all gain closing widgets and/or missing allowed-tools declarations
- hotfix git branch creation now requires user confirmation
- sprint-plan review-mode setup moved to Phase 0 (before gates run)
- team-combat gains architecture→implementation approval gate
- design-review APPROVED path consolidated from 3 widgets to 1 multiSelect

All 9 team-* skills:
- Phase 0 review-mode resolution added (solo/lean/full now respected)
- team-audio output path fixed (design/gdd/ → design/audio/)
- team-level final doc compilation delegated to level-designer subagent
- team-narrative localization-lead added to composition list
- team-qa sprint path fixed (flat files, not directories)
- team-release NO-GO override captures written justification
- team-live-ops Cancel verdict now explicitly BLOCKED

Other fixes:
- Art bible path standardized to design/art/art-bible.md (3 wrong refs)
- AD-PHASE-GATE added to lean-mode skip list in director-gates.md
- design-system duplicate 5d heading fixed; skeleton decline path added;
  mandatory agent spawns now respect review mode
- story-readiness acceptance criteria thresholds now type-aware
- create-stories gains multi-ADR and no-ADR handling guidance
- consistency-check creates docs/consistency-failures.md on first run
- retrospective frontmatter bash injection replaced with explicit Bash call
- smoke-check ls -t gains PowerShell fallback
- Conventional Commits format documented in coding-standards.md
- gate-check: ADR acceptance gate, QA plan check, chain-of-verification
  tool-action requirement all added

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix: expose --review flag in argument-hints for all team-* skills

All 9 team-* skills already implement Phase 0 review-mode resolution
internally (full/lean/solo), but none advertised [--review full|lean|solo]
in their argument-hint. Users had no way to discover the per-run override.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add SECURITY.md with coordinated disclosure policy

Defines scope, reporting process (GitHub private vulnerability reporting),
contributor security guidelines for hooks/skills/agents, and 90-day
coordinated disclosure timeline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md with framework contribution guidelines

Covers what PRs are welcome, skill/hook/agent technical requirements,
the collaborative principle, testing expectations, commit format,
and platform compatibility requirements.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: add v1.0.0-beta → v1.0 upgrade section to UPGRADING.md

Documents the 17 commits since the beta tag: new /vertical-slice gate,
entity inventory flow in /map-systems, AskUserQuestion widgets across
7 skills, --review flag exposure on team-* skills, bug fixes
(#21, #36, #42, #43, #45), and the new CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-13 20:15:08 +10:00

7.6 KiB

name, description, argument-hint, user-invocable, allowed-tools, model
name description argument-hint user-invocable allowed-tools model
team-audio Orchestrate audio team: audio-director + sound-designer + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer for full audio pipeline from direction to implementation. [feature or area to design audio for] [--review full|lean|solo] true Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash, Task, AskUserQuestion, TodoWrite sonnet

If no argument is provided, output usage guidance and exit without spawning any agents:

Usage: /team-audio [feature or area] — specify the feature or area to design audio for (e.g., combat, main menu, forest biome, boss encounter). Do not use AskUserQuestion here; output the guidance directly.

When this skill is invoked with an argument, orchestrate the audio team through a structured pipeline.

Decision Points: At each step transition, use AskUserQuestion to present the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels. The user must approve before moving to the next step.

Phase 0: Resolve Review Mode

  1. If --review [mode] was passed as an argument, use that mode.
  2. Else read production/review-mode.txt — use whatever is written there.
  3. Else default to lean.

Modes:

  • full — spawn all director and lead gates as described
  • lean — skip director gates unless they are PHASE-GATE type (CD-PHASE-GATE, TD-PHASE-GATE, PR-PHASE-GATE, AD-PHASE-GATE)
  • solo — skip all director gate spawning entirely; run the skill without any agent gates

Store the resolved mode for use in all subsequent phases.

  1. Read the argument for the target feature or area (e.g., combat, main menu, forest biome, boss encounter).

  2. Gather context:

    • Read relevant design docs in design/gdd/ for the feature
    • Read the sound bible at design/gdd/sound-bible.md if it exists
    • Read existing audio asset lists in assets/audio/
    • Read any existing sound design docs for this area

How to Delegate

Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:

  • subagent_type: audio-director — Sonic identity, emotional tone, audio palette
  • subagent_type: sound-designer — SFX specifications, audio events, mixing groups
  • subagent_type: technical-artist — Audio middleware, bus structure, memory budgets
  • subagent_type: [primary engine specialist] — Validate audio integration patterns for the engine
  • subagent_type: gameplay-programmer — Audio manager, gameplay triggers, adaptive music

Always provide full context in each agent's prompt (feature description, existing audio assets, design doc references).

  1. Orchestrate the audio team in sequence:

Step 1: Audio Direction (audio-director)

Spawn the audio-director agent to:

  • Define the sonic identity for this feature/area
  • Specify the emotional tone and audio palette
  • Set music direction (adaptive layers, stems, transitions)
  • Define audio priorities and mix targets
  • Establish any adaptive audio rules (combat intensity, exploration, tension)

Step 2: Sound Design and Audio Accessibility (parallel)

Spawn the sound-designer agent to:

  • Create detailed SFX specifications for every audio event
  • Define sound categories (ambient, UI, gameplay, music, dialogue)
  • Specify per-sound parameters (volume range, pitch variation, attenuation)
  • Plan audio event list with trigger conditions
  • Define mixing groups and ducking rules

Spawn the accessibility-specialist agent in parallel to:

  • Identify which audio events carry critical gameplay information (damage received, enemy nearby, objective complete) and require visual alternatives for hearing-impaired players
  • Specify subtitle requirements: which audio events need captions, what text format, on-screen duration
  • Check that no gameplay state is communicated by audio alone (all must have a visual fallback)
  • Review the audio event list for any that could cause issues for players with auditory sensitivities (high-frequency alerts, sudden loud events)
  • Output: audio accessibility requirements list integrated into the audio event spec

Step 3: Technical Implementation (parallel)

Spawn the technical-artist agent to:

  • Design the audio middleware integration (Wwise/FMOD/native)
  • Define audio bus structure and routing
  • Specify memory budgets for audio assets per platform
  • Plan streaming vs preloaded asset strategy
  • Design any audio-reactive visual effects

Spawn the primary engine specialist in parallel (from .claude/docs/technical-preferences.md Engine Specialists) to validate the integration approach:

  • Is the proposed audio middleware integration idiomatic for the engine? (e.g., Godot's built-in AudioStreamPlayer vs FMOD, Unity's Audio Mixer vs Wwise, Unreal's MetaSounds vs FMOD)
  • Any engine-specific audio node/component patterns that should be used?
  • Known audio system changes in the pinned engine version that affect the integration plan?
  • Output: engine audio integration notes to merge with the technical-artist's plan

If no engine is configured, skip the specialist spawn.

Step 4: Code Integration (gameplay-programmer)

Spawn the gameplay-programmer agent to:

  • Implement audio manager system or review existing
  • Wire up audio events to gameplay triggers
  • Implement adaptive music system (if specified)
  • Set up audio occlusion/reverb zones
  • Write unit tests for audio event triggers
  1. Compile the audio design document combining all team outputs.

  2. Save to design/audio/audio-[feature].md.

    Note: If design/audio/ does not exist, the sub-agent writing the document should create it (the directory will be created automatically when the file is written).

  3. Output a summary with: audio event count, estimated asset count, implementation tasks, and any open questions between team members.

Verdict: COMPLETE — audio design document produced and team pipeline finished.

If the pipeline stops because a dependency is unresolved (e.g., critical accessibility gap or missing GDD not resolved by the user):

Verdict: BLOCKED — [reason]

File Write Protocol

All file writes (audio design docs, SFX specs, implementation files) are delegated to sub-agents spawned via Task. Each sub-agent enforces the "May I write to [path]?" protocol. This orchestrator does not write files directly.

Next Steps

  • Review the audio design doc with the audio-director before implementation begins.
  • Use /dev-story to implement the audio manager and event system once the design is approved.
  • Run /asset-audit after audio assets are created to verify naming and format compliance.

Error Recovery Protocol

If any spawned agent (via Task) returns BLOCKED, errors, or cannot complete:

  1. Surface immediately: Report "[AgentName]: BLOCKED — [reason]" to the user before continuing to dependent phases
  2. Assess dependencies: Check whether the blocked agent's output is required by subsequent phases. If yes, do not proceed past that dependency point without user input.
  3. Offer options via AskUserQuestion with choices:
    • Skip this agent and note the gap in the final report
    • Retry with narrower scope
    • Stop here and resolve the blocker first
  4. Always produce a partial report — output whatever was completed. Never discard work because one agent blocked.

Common blockers:

  • Input file missing (story not found, GDD absent) → redirect to the skill that creates it
  • ADR status is Proposed → do not implement; run /architecture-decision first
  • Scope too large → split into two stories via /create-stories
  • Conflicting instructions between ADR and story → surface the conflict, do not guess