Files
Claude-Code-Game-Studios/.claude/skills/sprint-status/SKILL.md
Donchitos 0bbf25ec31 Pipeline integrity + brownfield adoption system
Pipeline integrity (4 fixes for snapshot-vs-live-reference problem):
- NEW docs/architecture/tr-registry.yaml: persistent stable TR-IDs per GDD
  requirement; /architecture-review bootstraps and appends, never renumbers
- /create-control-manifest: added Manifest Version stamp to header
- /create-epics-stories: stories embed TR-ID reference (not quoted text),
  Manifest Version from manifest, ADR status gate (Proposed → Blocked)
- /story-done: TR-ID registry lookup at review time, manifest staleness check
- /story-readiness: ADR Accepted check, TR-ID validity, manifest version check
- /review-all-gdds + /architecture-review: fixed parenthetical status values
  ("Needs Revision" only, no parentheticals that break exact-match reads)

Workflow infrastructure:
- NEW /help skill: context-aware "what's next" using workflow-catalog.yaml
- NEW .claude/docs/workflow-catalog.yaml: YAML-driven phase/step sequence
- /sprint-plan + /sprint-status: sprint-status.yaml machine-written tracking

Brownfield adoption system (migrate, not replace):
- NEW /adopt skill: format compliance audit (not existence check); classifies
  gaps BLOCKING/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW; produces docs/adoption-plan-[date].md with
  numbered migration plan; never regenerates existing artifacts
- /design-system retrofit [path]: fills only missing GDD sections, preserves
  all existing content
- /architecture-decision retrofit [path]: adds missing ADR sections (Status,
  ADR Dependencies, Engine Compatibility) without touching existing content
- /start option D: split into D1 (early-stage) and D2 (has GDDs/ADRs → adopt)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-11 18:46:07 +11:00

6.2 KiB

name, description, argument-hint, user-invocable, allowed-tools
name description argument-hint user-invocable allowed-tools
sprint-status Fast sprint status check. Reads the current sprint plan, scans story files for status, and produces a concise progress snapshot with burndown assessment and emerging risks. Run at any time during a sprint for quick situational awareness. [sprint-number or blank for current] true Read, Glob, Grep

Sprint Status

This is a fast situational awareness check, not a sprint review. It reads the current sprint plan and story files, scans for status markers, and produces a concise snapshot in under 30 lines. For detailed sprint management, use /sprint-plan update or /milestone-review.

This skill is read-only. It never proposes changes, never asks to write files, and makes at most one concrete recommendation.


1. Find the Sprint

  • If an argument is given (e.g., /sprint-status 3), search production/sprints/ for a file matching sprint-03.md, sprint-3.md, or similar. Report which file was found.
  • If no argument is given, find the most recently modified file in production/sprints/ and treat it as the current sprint.
  • If production/sprints/ does not exist or is empty, report: "No sprint files found. Start a sprint with /sprint-plan new." Then stop.

Read the sprint file in full. Extract:

  • Sprint number and goal
  • Start date and end date
  • All story or task entries with their priority (Must Have / Should Have / Nice to Have), owner, and estimate

2. Calculate Days Remaining

Using today's date and the sprint end date from the sprint file, calculate:

  • Total sprint days (end minus start)
  • Days elapsed
  • Days remaining
  • Percentage of time consumed

If the sprint file does not include explicit dates, note "Sprint dates not found — burndown assessment skipped."


3. Scan Story Status

First: check for production/sprint-status.yaml.

If it exists, read it directly — it is the authoritative source of truth. Extract status for each story from the status field. No markdown scanning needed. Use its sprint, goal, start, end fields instead of re-parsing the sprint plan.

If sprint-status.yaml does not exist (legacy sprint or first-time setup), fall back to markdown scanning:

  1. If the entry references a story file path, check if the file exists. Read the file and scan for status markers: DONE, COMPLETE, IN PROGRESS, BLOCKED, NOT STARTED (case-insensitive).
  2. If the entry has no file path (inline task in the sprint plan), scan the sprint plan itself for status markers next to that entry.
  3. If no status marker is found, classify as NOT STARTED.
  4. If a file is referenced but does not exist, classify as MISSING and note it.

When using the fallback, add a note at the bottom of the output: "⚠ No sprint-status.yaml found — status inferred from markdown. Run /sprint-plan update to generate one."

Optionally (fast check only — do not do a deep scan): grep src/ for a directory or file name that matches the story's system slug to check for implementation evidence. This is a hint only, not a definitive status.


4. Burndown Assessment

Calculate:

  • Tasks complete (DONE or COMPLETE)
  • Tasks in progress (IN PROGRESS)
  • Tasks blocked (BLOCKED)
  • Tasks not started (NOT STARTED or MISSING)
  • Completion percentage: (complete / total) * 100

Assess burndown by comparing completion percentage to time consumed percentage:

  • On Track: completion % is within 10 points of time consumed % or ahead
  • At Risk: completion % is 10-25 points behind time consumed %
  • Behind: completion % is more than 25 points behind time consumed %

If dates are unavailable, skip the burndown assessment and report "On Track / At Risk / Behind: unknown — sprint dates not found."


5. Output

Keep the total output to 30 lines or fewer. Use this format:

## Sprint [N] Status — [Today's Date]
**Sprint Goal**: [from sprint plan]
**Days Remaining**: [N] of [total] ([% time consumed])

### Progress: [complete/total] tasks ([%])

| Story / Task         | Priority   | Status      | Owner   | Blocker        |
|----------------------|------------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| [title]              | Must Have  | DONE        | [owner] |                |
| [title]              | Must Have  | IN PROGRESS | [owner] |                |
| [title]              | Must Have  | BLOCKED     | [owner] | [brief reason] |
| [title]              | Should Have| NOT STARTED | [owner] |                |

### Burndown: [On Track / At Risk / Behind]
[1-2 sentences. If behind: which Must Haves are at risk. If on track: confirm
and note any Should Haves the team could pull.]

### Must-Haves at Risk
[List any Must Have stories that are BLOCKED or NOT STARTED with less than
40% of sprint time remaining. If none, write "None."]

### Emerging Risks
[Any risks visible from the story scan: missing files, cascading blockers,
stories with no owner. If none, write "None identified."]

### Recommendation
[One concrete action, or "Sprint is on track — no action needed."]

6. Fast Escalation Rules

Apply these rules before outputting, and place the flag at the TOP of the output if triggered (above the status table):

Critical flag — if Must Have stories are BLOCKED or NOT STARTED and less than 40% of the sprint time remains:

SPRINT AT RISK: [N] Must Have stories are not complete with [X]% of sprint
time remaining. Recommend replanning with `/sprint-plan update`.

Completion flag — if all Must Have stories are DONE:

All Must Haves complete. Team can pull from Should Have backlog.

Missing stories flag — if any referenced story files do not exist:

NOTE: [N] story files referenced in the sprint plan are missing.
Run `/story-readiness sprint` to validate story file coverage.

Collaborative Protocol

This skill is read-only. It reports observed facts from files on disk.

  • It does not update the sprint plan
  • It does not change story status
  • It does not propose scope cuts (that is /sprint-plan update)
  • It makes at most one recommendation per run

For more detail on a specific story, the user can read the story file directly or run /story-readiness [path].

For sprint replanning, use /sprint-plan update. For end-of-sprint retrospective, use /milestone-review.