DonchitosandClaude Opus 5.5
b21fa0f7f2
Fix release for 1.1.1: the minimal path end to end, engine commands that run on Godot, Unity and Unreal, hook warnings you can see, and verdicts that say when they could not check. Details in CHANGELOG.md; upgrade steps in UPGRADING.md (v1.1.1 → v1.1.2). Fixes #67 Fixes #131 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WuJn2FdynEybfL5KC697nJ
1.6 KiB
Gate definition. The spawning skill passes this file's path to the director agent; the AGENT reads it — the parent session should not.
AD-ART-BIBLE — Art Bible Sign-Off
Agent: art-director | Model tier: session (inherit) | Domain: Visual identity, art bible, visual production readiness
Trigger: After the art bible is drafted (/art-bible), before asset production begins
Context to pass:
- Art bible path (
design/art/art-bible.md) - Game pillars and core fantasy
- Platform and performance constraints (
platform.*andperformance.*fromproject.yaml, falling back to.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md) - Visual identity anchor chosen during brainstorm (from
design/gdd/game-concept.md; if there is nodesign/gdd/game-concept.md, pass the "Art & audio direction" line ofdesign/game-brief.mdinstead)
Prompt:
"Review this art bible for completeness and internal consistency. Does the color system match the mood targets? Does the shape language follow from the visual identity statement? Are the asset standards achievable within the platform constraints? Does the character design direction give artists enough to work from without over-specifying? Are there contradictions between sections? Would an outsourcing team be able to produce assets from this document without additional briefing? Return APPROVE (art bible is production-ready), CONCERNS [specific sections needing clarification], or REJECT [fundamental inconsistencies that must be resolved before asset production begins]."
Verdicts: APPROVE / CONCERNS / REJECT