Files
Claude-Code-Game-Studios/.claude/skills/skill-improve/SKILL.md
T
DonchitosandClaude Opus 5.5 b21fa0f7f2 Release 1.1.2 — the default path works end to end
Fix release for 1.1.1: the minimal path end to end, engine commands that
run on Godot, Unity and Unreal, hook warnings you can see, and verdicts
that say when they could not check. Details in CHANGELOG.md; upgrade
steps in UPGRADING.md (v1.1.1 → v1.1.2).

Fixes #67
Fixes #131

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WuJn2FdynEybfL5KC697nJ
2026-09-29 21:32:19 +10:00

173 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
name: skill-improve
description: "Improve a skill via a test-fix-retest loop — static checks, targeted fixes, keep or revert on score change."
argument-hint: "[skill-name]"
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Bash, Bash(bash "*/.claude/skills/skill-improve/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config *)
model: sonnet
---
!`bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys automation`
**Automation mode**: Resolve `modes.automation` (`project.local.yaml` →
`project.yaml` → default `collaborative`). Every `AskUserQuestion` call and
every file write follows `.claude/docs/automation-modes.md`
(collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds;
`automation_always_ask` categories always prompt).
# Skill Improve
Runs an improvement loop on a single skill:
test → fix → retest → keep or revert.
---
## Phase 1: Parse Argument
Read the skill name from the first argument. If missing, output usage and stop:
```
Usage: /skill-improve [skill-name]
Example: /skill-improve tech-debt
```
Verify `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md` exists. If not, stop with:
"Skill '[name]' not found."
---
## Phase 2: Baseline Test
Run `/skill-test static [name]` and record the baseline score:
- Count of FAILs
- Count of WARNs
- Which specific checks failed (Check 1–7)
Display to the user:
```
Static baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings
Failing: Check 4 (no ask-before-write), Check 5 (no handoff)
```
If the static result is **NOT ASSESSED** (the skill file could not be read or
parsed), stop and report it with its reason: there is no score to improve, and
0 FAILs from a file nobody could read is not a clean result.
If baseline is 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs, note it and proceed to Phase 2b.
### Phase 2b: Category Baseline
Look up the skill's `category:` field in `CCGS Skill Testing Framework/catalog.yaml`.
If no `category:` field is found, display:
"Category: not yet assigned — skipping category checks."
and skip to Phase 3.
If category is found, run `/skill-test category [name]` and record the category baseline:
- Count of FAILs
- Count of WARNs
- Which specific category rubric metrics failed
Display to the user:
```
Category baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings ([category] rubric)
```
A category result of **NOT ASSESSED** (a rubric section the skill-test could not
find or apply) is reported with its reason and is not a zero: the category
dimension is then excluded from "already passes" below.
If BOTH static and category baselines are 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs — and neither is
NOT ASSESSED — stop:
"This skill already passes all static and category checks. No improvements needed."
---
## Phase 3: Diagnose
Read the full skill file at `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`.
For each failing or warning **static** check, identify the exact gap:
- **Check 1 fail** → which frontmatter field is missing
- **Check 2 fail** → how many phases found vs. minimum required
- **Check 3 fail** → no verdict keywords anywhere in the skill body
- **Check 4 fail** → Write or Edit in allowed-tools but no ask-before-write language
- **Check 5 warn** → no follow-up or next-step section at the end
- **Check 6 warn** → `context: fork` set but fewer than 5 phases found
- **Check 7 warn** → argument-hint is empty or doesn't match documented modes
For each failing or warning **category** check (if category was assigned in Phase 2b),
identify the exact gap in the skill's text. For example:
- If G2 fails (gate mode, director panel width): skill body does not size the
PHASE-GATE panel from `modes.workflow` (PR at `minimal`, TD + PR at `standard`,
all 4 at `full`)
- If A2 fails (authoring, no per-section May-I-write): skill asks once at the end, not
before each section write
- If T3 fails (team, BLOCKED not surfaced): skill doesn't halt dependent work on blocked agent
Show the full combined diagnosis to the user before proposing any changes.
---
## Phase 4: Propose Fix
Write a targeted fix for each failure and warning. Show the proposed changes
as clearly marked before/after blocks. Only change what is failing — do not
rewrite sections that are passing.
Ask: "May I write this improved version to `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`?"
If the user says no, stop here.
---
## Phase 5: Write and Retest
Record the current content of the skill file — the exact text, kept in this
conversation — so Phase 6 can restore it.
Write the improved skill to `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`.
Re-run `/skill-test static [name]` and record the new static score — measured by that run, never stated from the edit.
If a category was assigned, also re-run `/skill-test category [name]` and record the new category score.
Display the comparison:
```
Static: Before [N] failures, [M] warnings → After [N'] failures, [M'] warnings
Category: Before [N] failures, [M] warnings → After [N'] failures, [M'] warnings (if applicable)
Combined: [before] → [after] (improved / no change / worse)
```
`[before]` and `[after]` are the Phase 6 combined counts — failures plus
warnings, both dimensions — e.g. `Combined: 3 → 0 (improved)`.
---
## Phase 6: Verdict
Count the combined failure total: static FAILs + category FAILs + static WARNs + category WARNs.
**A re-test that comes back NOT ASSESSED** (for example, the edit broke the
frontmatter so the file no longer parses) is never an improvement, whatever its
counts: take the "did not improve" branch below.
**If combined score improved (combined failure count is lower than baseline):**
Report: "Score improved. Changes kept."
Show a summary of what was fixed in each dimension.
**If combined score is the same or worse:**
Report: "Combined score did not improve."
Show what changed and why it may not have helped.
Ask: "May I restore `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md` to the content it had before this run?"
If yes: write the content recorded in Phase 5 back to the file with Write; if no, leave the file as written. Never
`git checkout` it — that returns the last *committed* version and discards any edits
made before this run that were not yet committed.
---
## Phase 7: Next Steps
- Run `/skill-test static all` to find the next skill with failures.
- Run `/skill-improve [next-name]` to continue the loop on another skill.
- Run `/skill-test audit` to see overall coverage progress.