Files
Claude-Code-Game-Studios/.claude/skills/architecture-review/references/9-handoff.md
T
DonchitosandClaude Opus 5.5 be8993bbc5 Release 1.1.3 — long skills keep their later steps
Fix release for 1.1.2: the 14 longest skills keep their later phases
after a compaction, a question nobody answered is never taken as an
answer, settings read the same from a subfolder, the commit check works
for a project in a subfolder of a larger repository, every skill opens
with a title, and the shipped allow rules no longer approve deleting a
branch or writing files without asking. Details in CHANGELOG.md; upgrade
steps in UPGRADING.md (v1.1.2 → v1.1.3).

Refs #83
Refs #133

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0185en4t76fPn7315q4c3nko
2026-10-08 17:52:48 +11:00

36 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown

# /architecture-review — Phase 9: Handoff
> Part of `/architecture-review`. `SKILL.md` names when to read this file; the settings it
> resolved and the rules under its later headings still apply here.
## Phase 9: Handoff
After completing the review and writing approved files, present:
1. **Immediate actions**: List the top 3 ADRs to create (highest-impact gaps first,
Foundation layer before Feature layer)
2. **Pre-gate checklist**: Check whether these exist via Glob and mark each ✅ or ❌:
- the engine's test root — `tests/unit/` and `tests/integration/` (Godot), `Assets/Tests/EditMode/` and `Assets/Tests/PlayMode/` (Unity), `Source/<Module>/Private/Tests/` (Unreal) — if ❌: run `/test-setup`
- `.github/workflows/tests.yml` — if ❌: run `/test-setup`
- `design/accessibility-requirements.md` — if ❌: run `/ux-design`
- `design/ux/interaction-patterns.md` — if ❌: run `/ux-design`
Present ❌ items as required steps before gate-check. Do not offer `/gate-check`
as an option if any item is ❌ — offer the missing skill to run instead.
3. **Rerun trigger**: "Re-run `/architecture-review` after each new ADR is written
to verify coverage improves"
Then close with `AskUserQuestion` tailored to the pre-gate checklist state:
- If ADR gaps remain or any pre-gate item is ❌:
- "Architecture review complete. What would you like to do next?"
- [A] Write a missing ADR — open a fresh session and run `/architecture-decision [system]`
- [B] Run `/test-setup` — required before gate-check (only show if test infrastructure is ❌)
- [C] Run `/ux-design` — required before gate-check (only show if UX/accessibility files are ❌)
- [D] Stop here for this session
- If all pre-gate checklist items are ✅ and no blocking ADR gaps remain:
- "Architecture review complete. All pre-gate items confirmed. What would you like to do next?"
- [A] Run `/gate-check pre-production`
- [B] Write a missing ADR — open a fresh session and run `/architecture-decision [system]`
- [C] Stop here for this session
---