mirror of
https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios.git
synced 2026-10-16 01:37:05 +00:00
DonchitosandClaude Opus 5
d05699707f
`project.yaml` at the repo root is now the single source of truth for a project's configuration, replacing `production/stage.txt`, `production/review-mode.txt` and `.claude/docs/technical-preferences.md` (all three still read as a fallback; nothing is force-deleted). **`modes.rigor` — one question instead of six.** `minimal`, `standard` or `full` fronts six knobs: `modes.workflow`, `docs.density`, `qa.level`, `modes.story_granularity`, `modes.review_mode` and `team.size`. It defaults to `minimal`, which is a change from 1.0's behaviour: the heavier tier was measured costing several times more to reach working code without producing a better result, and returning nothing when a fresh developer inherited the project. Pin `modes.rigor: standard` to keep 1.0's process level. Also in this release: - `/settings` to view or change any setting, and `project.local.yaml` for per-developer preferences that should not be committed. - `system_overrides` to hold one system to a higher standard than the rest of the project, and `testing.strict` to set per test type whether missing evidence blocks a story or warns. - A story that changes anything the player sees is not closed until the game has been launched, observed, and a screenshot retained in `production/qa/evidence/`. A parse check is not a run. This holds at every rigor level, including `minimal`, where automated tests are waived but the look is not. - The code root is engine-specific and enforced as such: Godot `src/`, Unity `Assets/`, Unreal `Source/<Module>/`. Two of the three will not build a project laid out any other way. - Migration tooling for existing projects: `.claude/scripts/migrate-v1-config.sh` converts a 1.0 layout, non-destructively by default, with a report to review before `--finalize` deletes anything. - Ask-before-write holds regardless of personal automation settings. Upgrading from 1.0 or earlier: see UPGRADING.md. Full list of changes: CHANGELOG.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016xvzG3i7pWQg4LjyDwWMXd
28 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
28 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
> Gate definition. The spawning skill passes this file's path to the director agent; the AGENT reads it — the parent session should not.
|
|
|
|
# CD-SYSTEMS — Systems Decomposition Vision Check
|
|
|
|
Agent: `creative-director` | Model tier: Opus | Domain: Vision, pillars, player experience
|
|
|
|
**Trigger**: After the systems index is written by `/map-systems` — validates the
|
|
complete system set before GDD authoring begins
|
|
|
|
**Context to pass**:
|
|
- Systems index path (`design/gdd/systems-index.md`)
|
|
- Game pillars and core fantasy (from `design/gdd/game-concept.md`)
|
|
- Priority tier assignments (MVP / Vertical Slice / Alpha / Full Vision)
|
|
- Any high-risk or bottleneck systems identified in the dependency map
|
|
|
|
**Prompt**:
|
|
> "Review this systems decomposition against the game's design pillars. Does the
|
|
> full set of MVP-tier systems collectively deliver the core fantasy? Are there
|
|
> systems whose mechanics don't serve any stated pillar — indicating they may be
|
|
> scope creep? Are there pillar-critical player experiences that have no system
|
|
> assigned to deliver them? Are any systems missing that the core loop requires?
|
|
> Return APPROVE (systems serve the vision), CONCERNS [specific gaps or
|
|
> misalignments with their pillar implications], or REJECT [fundamental gaps —
|
|
> the decomposition misses critical design intent and must be revised before GDD
|
|
> authoring begins]."
|
|
|
|
**Verdicts**: APPROVE / CONCERNS / REJECT
|